Aesthetic appreciation represents one of the most sophisticated intersections of human perception, affective neuroscience, and cognitive evaluation. When individuals encounter a masterpiece of visual art, a breathtaking alpine landscape, or a sublime musical cadence, their response transcends mere sensory detection, activating an intricate matrix of valuation systems and contemplative states. Understanding this multifaceted capacity offers profound insights into human consciousness, cultural evolution, and the fundamental architecture of subjective well-being.
Aesthetic Appreciation
1. Concise Definition
Aesthetic appreciation refers to the psychological, cognitive, and affective process through which an individual perceives, interprets, and evaluates an object, event, or sensory stimulus primarily for its perceptual and formal qualities rather than its immediate utilitarian function. This experience is characterized by focused sensory engagement, emotional resonance—ranging from mild pleasure to profound awe—and reflective contemplation of harmony, meaning, and form.
In experimental psychology and neuroaesthetics, aesthetic appreciation is conceptualized as a multi-stage phenomenon involving sensory-motor processing, cognitive mastery, and affective valuation. It is distinguished from mundane object recognition by the engagement of self-referential valuation networks, including the default mode network and reward circuitry. Rather than evaluating whether an object satisfies an instrumental need, aesthetic appreciation queries how the object feels, resonates, and coheres within the observer’s subjective phenomenological landscape.
Furthermore, aesthetic appreciation is not restricted to fine art or human-made artifacts. It encompasses natural environments, mathematical proofs, architectural spaces, human movement, and everyday objects. Across these diverse domains, the defining hallmark remains an intentional or spontaneous orientation toward perceptual qualities, structural coherence, and the emotional states elicited by the act of contemplation itself.
2. Etymology & Linguistic Origin
The term aesthetic derives from the Ancient Greek word aisthēsis (αἴσθησις), meaning “sensation,” “sense perception,” or “feeling,” which stems from the verb aisthanesthai (αἰσθάνεσθαι), meaning “to perceive, feel, or notice.” In classical antiquity, the root denoted sensory experience in general, contrasting with noesis (pure intellectual or conceptual cognition).
The modern philosophical usage of aesthetics was inaugurated in the mid-eighteenth century by German philosopher Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten in his 1735 work Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus, and subsequently in his landmark two-volume treatise Aesthetica (1750–1758). Baumgarten appropriated the Greek root to establish a distinct branch of philosophical inquiry: the science of sensory cognition (“scientia cognitionis sensitivae”), positioning it as an analog to logic, which governed intellectual cognition.
The word appreciation originates from the Late Latin appretiatus, the past participle of appretiare (“to appraise, set a price to”), formed by combining ad- (“to”) and pretium (“price, value, worth”). Over the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the term transitioned into Middle French as apprécier and into English as a descriptor of recognizing the true worth or qualitative merit of an object. The synthesis of both terms into “aesthetic appreciation” arose during the nineteenth century within British aesthetic philosophy and romanticism, eventually being formalized by early experimental psychologists such as Gustav Theodor Fechner to designate the empirical appraisal of aesthetic stimuli.
3. Pronunciation & Grammatical Form
Pronunciation: Aesthetic appreciation is phonetically transcribed in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) as /ɛsˈθɛt.ɪk əˌpriː.ʃiˈeɪ.ʃən/ in General American English, and /iːsˈθɛt.ɪk əˌpriː.siˈeɪ.ʃən/ in Received Pronunciation British English.
Grammatical Form: The term functions syntactically as a compound noun phrase:
- Noun (uncountable): “Her profound aesthetic appreciation of Gothic architecture deepened throughout her travels.”
- Verb form: The constituent verb is to appreciate aesthetically (e.g., “The panel appreciated the choreographic structure aesthetically rather than purely technically”).
- Adjectival derivative: Aesthetically appreciative (e.g., “An aesthetically appreciative observer will notice subtle nuances in tonal gradation”).
- Orthographic variants: The British and Commonwealth English variant retains the classical ligature or digraph aesthetic or historically æsthetic, whereas American English predominantly uses aesthetic, with esthetic persisting in medical and dental nomenclature.
4. Detailed Conceptual Explanation
At its core, aesthetic appreciation involves a fundamental shift in the human orientation toward reality. In normative, daily human functioning, perception operates within an instrumental, action-oriented schema: sensory input is rapidly classified to facilitate survival, navigation, goal attainment, and threat avoidance. In contrast, the aesthetic stance detaches perception from immediate pragmatic utility, permitting prolonged attention to sensory contours, relational proportions, textures, emotional connotations, and symbolic depths.
This phenomenological decoupling allows for what Immanuel Kant famously designated as “disinterested delight” (interesseloses Wohlgefallen). Here, disinterested does not imply indifference; rather, it indicates freedom from instrumental desire, possessiveness, or practical manipulation. When an observer engages in aesthetic appreciation, the existence of the object is celebrated for its own sake, creating an autonomous cognitive-affective clearing wherein contemplation becomes its own reward.
From a modern cognitive science perspective, aesthetic appreciation involves a dynamic interplay between bottom-up perceptual features and top-down conceptual schemas. Bottom-up mechanisms process perceptual fluencies such as symmetry, balance, contrast, visual complexity, and harmonic proportions. Simultaneously, top-down cognitive processes recruit historical knowledge, semantic associations, personal memories, and cultural expectations. This dual processing culminates in an integrated mental representation that yields an evaluation of beauty, sublimity, or artistic significance.
Furthermore, aesthetic appreciation entails a complex affective architecture. It is not limited to mild sensory pleasure or hedonics; it frequently encompasses profound negative or mixed emotions that are transformed through aesthetic framing. Observers regularly report deep appreciation for tragic theater, haunting melodies, or unsettling visual art. In these contexts, negative affects such as sorrow, tension, or horror are experienced within a safe, decoupled frame, leading to catharsis, cognitive insight, and emotional enrichment.
Finally, the boundaries of aesthetic appreciation extend beyond passive reception. It constitutes an active, generative act of meaning-making. The viewer, listener, or reader reconstructs the artwork or natural phenomenon within their private subjective space, projecting intentionality, discerning latent structures, and bridging perceptual gaps. Thus, aesthetic appreciation is fundamentally an interactive dialogue between the intrinsic structural properties of an object and the interpretive capacities of a conscious mind.
5. Historical Development
The philosophical inquiry into aesthetic appreciation traces back to classical antiquity. In Plato’s Symposium, aesthetic response was treated as an ascent from physical attraction to the contemplation of the transcendent Idea or Form of Beauty. Aristotle, in the Poetics, shifted the focus toward mimesis and psychological mechanics, arguing that tragedy elicits aesthetic appreciation through catharsis—the structured purging and resolution of pity and fear within a formal artistic vessel.
During the Enlightenment, the locus of inquiry pivoted from objective cosmic harmony to human subjective psychology. In his 1757 essay Of the Standard of Taste, David Hume explored the tension between individual sensory variability and the consensus of critical appraisal, arguing that aesthetic appreciation depends on delicate sensory faculties cultivated through practice, comparison, and freedom from prejudice. Decades later, Immanuel Kant synthesized these concepts in his Critique of Judgment (1790), formalizing the notion of aesthetic judgment as a universal subjective claim rooted in the “free play” between the human imagination and understanding.
The late nineteenth century witnessed the birth of empirical aesthetics, initiated by Gustav Theodor Fechner in his 1876 work Vorschule der Aesthetik. Fechner revolutionized the field by advocating for an “aesthetics from below” (inductive, data-driven, and experimental) in explicit contrast to the philosophical “aesthetics from above” (deductive and metaphysical). Fechner systematically measured human preferences for geometric proportions, including the Golden Ratio, establishing psychophysics as a foundational methodology for analyzing aesthetic taste.
In the twentieth century, Daniel Berlyne revitalized empirical aesthetics through psychobiology, proposing in 1971 that aesthetic appreciation is driven by exploratory behavior and optimal levels of physiological arousal governed by “collative variables” such as novelty, complexity, uncertainty, and conflict. The late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries ushered in the era of neuroaesthetics, spearheaded by Semir Zeki, V. S. Ramachandran, and Helmut Leder, which utilizes functional neuroimaging to map the neural correlates of aesthetic appreciation, uniting evolutionary biology, cognitive science, and art theory.
6. Theoretical Foundations
Aesthetic appreciation is elucidated by several robust theoretical frameworks spanning psychology, cognitive science, and evolutionary theory:
The Cognitive-Affective Stage Model: Formulated by Helmut Leder and colleagues (2004, 2014), this model delineates aesthetic appreciation as a five-stage processing trajectory: perception (early sensory analysis), implicit classification (style and category identification), explicit classification (historical and contextual appraisal), cognitive mastering (self-reflective interpretation), and evaluation. The culmination of this trajectory produces two distinct outputs: an aesthetic judgment (an evaluative, cognitive verdict) and an aesthetic emotion (an affective, physiological response).
The Predictive Processing Framework: Rooted in contemporary computational neuroscience, this theory suggests that the human brain operates as an active inference engine. Under this view, aesthetic appreciation arises from the successful resolution of “prediction errors.” Artworks and complex aesthetic environments deliberately introduce perceptual surprises, ambiguities, or rule violations; when the brain successfully resolves these tensions and uncovers underlying order, it releases dopaminergic reward signals, generating the pleasurable feeling of aesthetic discovery.
The Evolutionary Adaptation Model: Evolutionary psychologists, including Denis Dutton and Geoffrey Miller, suggest that aesthetic appreciation evolved as an adaptive mechanism. Sensitivity to symmetry, biological vitality, vibrant colors, and landscape prospects signaled environmental safety, resource richness, and high genetic fitness in prospective mates. Over evolutionary history, these utilitarian survival heuristics became abstracted, enabling humans to derive pleasure from purely symbolic and formal configurations.
The Transformative Experience and DMN Framework: Neuroimaging studies highlight the involvement of the Default Mode Network (DMN)—the neural circuitry engaged during introspection, autobiographical memory, and self-referential thought. While most external perceptual tasks suppress the DMN, intense aesthetic appreciation uniquely co-activates external sensory pathways and the DMN simultaneously. This biological phenomenon accounts for why aesthetic experiences frequently feel intimately meaningful, transcendent, and personally transformative.
7. Key Components, Types & Dimensions
Aesthetic appreciation is an umbrella construct comprising distinct dimensions, varieties, and operational components:
- Perceptual-Sensory Fluency: The ease with which the cognitive apparatus processes the formal visual, auditory, or tactile elements of a stimulus, including symmetry, balance, proportion, rhythm, and clarity.
- Semantic and Symbolic Mastery: The interpretive capacity to discern meaning, contextual references, allegories, and narrative coherence embedded within the aesthetic object.
- Affective Resonance: The emotional response elicited during contemplation, which spans basic positive valence (delight, pleasure) to profound complex states (catharsis, melancholia, awe, elevation, and chills/goosebumps).
- Aesthetic Judgment vs. Aesthetic Emotion: The critical distinction between an objective, analytical appraisal (“I recognize that this canvas displays exceptional technical brilliance”) and an immediate, visceral emotional reaction (“This painting moves me to tears”).
- Aesthetic Modes:
- The Beautiful: Experiences grounded in harmony, proportion, coherence, smoothness, and gentle pleasure.
- The Sublime: Encounters characterized by overwhelming vastness, immense power, existential awe, and a faint element of terror transformed through safe distance.
- The Picturesque: Appreciation rooted in idiosyncratic variety, textured intricacy, and whimsical irregularity.
- The Grotesque/Challenging: Modern aesthetic appreciation involving cognitive dissonance, transgression, irony, and the dismantling of conventional harmony.
8. Examples & Illustrative Cases
To understand the breadth of aesthetic appreciation, consider several illustrative cases across different modalities:
Case 1: The Visual Arts (Chiaroscuro in Caravaggio): When an observer stands before Caravaggio’s The Calling of Saint Matthew, aesthetic appreciation operates on multiple simultaneous registers. Sensorial processing detects extreme contrast in illumination (chiaroscuro), which directs gaze trajectories along dramatic diagonal vectors. Cognitively, the observer identifies the biblical narrative and the deliberate juxtaposition of sacred revelation with an unadorned, seventeenth-century tavern setting. Affectively, the stark lighting produces tension and reverence. The observer does not assess the painting for commercial utility or pedagogical training; rather, they experience a unified, sustained contemplation of human fallibility, divine intrusion, and compositional mastery.
Case 2: Natural Environments (The Alpine Sublime): An individual standing at the precipice of the Grand Canyon or gazing upon the snow-covered peaks of the Karakoram Range experiences aesthetic appreciation devoid of human cultural intentionality. The sheer scale, dramatic verticality, and silent stillness initially trigger a micro-appraisal of vulnerability, which is swiftly converted into the positive aesthetic state of awe. The observer’s default mode network activates, leading to an attenuation of the ego, an altered perception of time, and a heightened sense of ecological interconnectedness.
Case 3: Abstract Conceptual Systems (Mathematical Elegance): Aesthetic appreciation extends beyond sensory perception into the purely conceptual realm. A theoretical physicist reviewing Euler’s identity ($e^{i\pi} + 1 = 0$) often describes the equation as “sublimely beautiful.” This appreciation does not rely on visual coloration or auditory acoustics, but on the profound compression of five fundamental mathematical constants into a concise, symmetrical, and unexpected relationship. The cognitive apparatus experiences an intellectual thrill of symmetry and profound structural truth.
9. Measurement & Assessment
Quantifying aesthetic appreciation represents a methodological challenge at the intersection of psychometrics, psychophysiology, and neuroscience. Researchers deploy multiple complementary instruments:
Psychometric Self-Report Inventories:
- Aesthetic Fluency Scale: Developed by Paul Silvia and colleagues, this instrument measures an individual’s self-reported familiarity with, and knowledge of, historical art movements, artists, and critical concepts, predicting sophisticated cognitive engagement with complex stimuli.
- Aesthetic Experience Scale (AES): A structured multidimensional inventory that quantifies the frequency, intensity, and phenomenology of an individual’s aesthetic encounters across diverse life domains.
- Aesthetic Emotions Scale (AESTHEMOS): Designed by Mathias Scherer, Valentin Wagner, and colleagues (2019), this comprehensive 42-item scale measures 21 discrete aesthetic emotional states organized into overarching dimensions: prototypical aesthetic emotions (awe, enchantment), pleasing emotions (joy, humor), epistemic emotions (curiosity, insight), and negative/challenging emotions (unease, disgust).
- Vienna Art Interest and Art Knowledge Questionnaire (VAIAK): Designed to evaluate empirical differences between naive viewers and artistic experts regarding aesthetic processing tendencies.
Physiological and Neurological Metrics: Empirical researchers correlate self-report data with autonomic and central nervous system indicators. Skin conductance responses (SCR) and electrocardiography evaluate autonomic nervous system arousal during aesthetic encounters. Facial electromyography (EMG)—tracking the corrugator supercilii and zygomaticus major muscles—detects subtle micro-expressions of valence. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) tracks activation patterns across the anterior insula, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), ventral striatum, and DMN during aesthetic evaluations.
10. Applications & Practical Significance
Aesthetic appreciation exerts considerable influence across diverse applied fields, establishing that it is not merely a rarefied pursuit for cultural elites, but a critical contributor to psychological health, pedagogy, urban infrastructure, and industrial design:
Clinical Psychology and Art Therapy: Engaging with aesthetically rich environments stimulates creative expression and emotional processing. Aesthetic engagement induces states of mindful presence, mitigates depressive rumination by shifting attention away from negative self-focus, and fosters neuroplasticity through novel perceptual and cognitive challenges.
Architecture and Biophilic Urbanism: The field of neuro-architecture integrates principles of aesthetic appreciation into the design of public spaces, educational institutions, and healthcare centers. Incorporating natural light, biophilic elements (such as fractal geometries, living plant walls, and natural wood), and harmonious spatial proportions has been shown to reduce physiological cortisol levels, accelerate patient recovery times in hospitals, and heighten concentration in workplace settings.
Education and Pedagogical Development: Cultivating aesthetic appreciation in educational curricula enriches critical thinking and tolerance for ambiguity. Exposing students to complex, multifaceted artworks encourages them to hold contradictory interpretations in mind simultaneously, expanding their epistemic humility and interpretive sophistication.
Industrial Design and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI): In commercial development, the “aesthetic-usability effect” demonstrates that consumers perceive aesthetically pleasing interfaces and physical products as more functional, intuitive, and trustworthy, even before interacting directly with their technical capabilities.
11. Research & Empirical Evidence
Decades of empirical investigation have shed light on the mechanisms, biological markers, and structural behavioral patterns underpinning aesthetic appreciation:
In a seminal meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on aesthetic appreciation, Semir Zeki, Tomohiro Ishizu, and their collaborators demonstrated that across auditory, visual, and conceptual domains, stimuli evaluated as aesthetically beautiful consistently elicit elevated neural activity within the medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC). This finding suggests a common neural currency for aesthetic valuation, regardless of whether the incoming sensory inputs are sonic, pictographic, or mathematical.
Further neuroscientific work by Edward Vessel, G. Gabrielle Starr, and Nava Rubin (2012, 2013) published in Frontiers in Neuroscience demonstrated the striking involvement of the Default Mode Network during peak aesthetic experiences. While the DMN is typically downregulated during challenging external perceptual tasks, Vessel and colleagues revealed that deeply moving visual art reverses this trend. When a painting was rated at the absolute peak of aesthetic appreciation, the DMN was strongly engaged alongside visual sensory cortices, indicating that the stimulus had triggered deep personal resonance and self-referential integration.
In developmental and cognitive research, Paul Silvia (2005, 2008) conducted extensive empirical evaluations demonstrating that aesthetic appreciation diverges markedly based on an observer’s level of aesthetic expertise. Novice observers typically rely upon processing fluency, prioritizing symmetry, pleasant color harmonies, and photographic realism. In contrast, experienced art viewers exhibit high tolerance for cognitive conflict, ambiguity, conceptual irony, and dissonant structures, deriving aesthetic satisfaction from interpretive problem-solving rather than sensory pleasure alone.
12. Cultural & Cross-Cultural Considerations
A fundamental debate within empirical aesthetics concerns the balance between universal biological preferences and culture-specific canons of taste:
On one hand, evolutionary anthropologists and cross-cultural psychologists have uncovered cross-cultural regularities in aesthetic valuation. Across diverse geographic and socioeconomic cohorts, human beings exhibit spontaneous preferences for natural landscapes featuring savannah-like attributes: open grassy vistas, presence of fresh water, clusters of shade trees, and clear vantage points. Similarly, visual symmetry and facial averageness are widely appreciated across cultures, likely reflecting universal biological markers of genetic health and environmental viability.
On the other hand, cultural traditions systematically shape the conceptual frameworks that guide aesthetic appreciation. Western aesthetic traditions, originating in classical Greece and the Renaissance, historically prioritized proportion, geometric symmetry, figurative realism, and monumental permanence. In contrast, Japanese traditional aesthetics—embodied in concepts such as wabi-sabi (侘寂)—celebrates the beauty of impermanence, asymmetry, roughness, and natural decay. The Japanese concept of yūgen (幽玄) values profound grace and mystery, finding aesthetic excellence in subtle shadows and unseen depths rather than overt, illuminated clarity.
Furthermore, postcolonial scholars emphasize that the modern institutional construct of aesthetic appreciation—characterized by silent, detached museum contemplation—is a specific product of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century European bourgeois society. In many Indigenous, African, and Oceanic traditions, artistic objects and performances are inseparable from sacred ritual, ancestral communication, functional utility, and community participation, rendering detached contemplation culturally incomplete.
13. Criticisms, Debates & Limitations
Despite its theoretical maturity, the concept of aesthetic appreciation faces ongoing criticisms and theoretical schisms:
The Charge of Elitism and Cultural Hegemony: Sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, in his landmark work Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (1979), critiqued the notion of pure aesthetic appreciation as an ideological fiction. Bourdieu argued that aesthetic taste functions primarily as a mechanism of social stratification and “cultural capital.” What high-status classes celebrate as disinterested, refined aesthetic appreciation is, according to this view, an acquired class habitus designed to reproduce social hierarchy and exclude marginalized groups.
The “Disinterestedness” Controversy: Phenomenologists, pragmatists, and feminist philosophers have vigorously contested the Kantian ideal of disinterested contemplation. Thinkers such as John Dewey, in Art as Experience (1934), maintained that true aesthetic appreciation is deeply rooted in embodied, participatory living rather than detached psychological isolation. Feminist critics further argue that disinterested contemplation often masks an objectifying, male-dominated gaze that detaches creative works from ethical, political, and material realities.
Methodological Reductionism in Neuroaesthetics: Contemporary art theorists and critical psychologists have raised alarms regarding neuroaesthetic reductionism. Critics argue that measuring blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses via fMRI while participants view digital slides of paintings inside a confined scanner fundamentally strips aesthetic appreciation of its historical context, physical materiality, architectural setting, and cultural aura.
14. Related Terms & Distinctions
To prevent conceptual conflation, aesthetic appreciation must be distinguished from several closely related terms:
- Aesthetic Preference: A rudimentary, rapid affective inclination toward one stimulus over another (e.g., preferring blue over yellow). In contrast, aesthetic appreciation involves sustained attention, structural analysis, and reflective emotional engagement.
- Art Appreciation: A domain-specific subset of aesthetic appreciation focused exclusively on human cultural artifacts classified as fine or applied art. Aesthetic appreciation is broader, embracing nature, design, human bodies, mathematics, and everyday experiences.
- Sensory Pleasure (Hedonics): An immediate, direct biological reward derived from sensory receptors (e.g., tasting sugar, feeling warmth). Aesthetic appreciation involves symbolic, formal, and self-referential cognitive layers that transcend biological gratification.
- Connoisseurship: The technical, specialized capacity to authenticate, attribute, and catalog artifacts based on deep historical and stylistic knowledge. While connoisseurship can inform aesthetic appreciation, the latter remains an experiential, affective-cognitive psychological state accessible without curatorial expertise.
- Neuroaesthetics: The academic discipline and scientific field dedicated to studying the neurological bases of art and beauty, whereas aesthetic appreciation is the psychological phenomenon under study.
15. Summary / Key Takeaways
Aesthetic appreciation is an essential, highly refined human faculty that integrates sensory perception, cognitive reflection, and emotional depth. It allows individuals to transition from utilitarian, task-oriented thinking into sustained contemplation, discovering value, coherence, and profound meaning across artistic creations, natural environments, and conceptual landscapes. Far from being an idle indulgence or an elitist pursuit, empirical evidence indicates that aesthetic appreciation enriches psychological well-being, supports cognitive flexibility, and bridges our evolutionary sensory heritage with deep human self-reflection.
References
- Baumgarten, A. G. (1750–1758). Aesthetica. Impens. I. C. Kleyb.
- Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
- Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
- Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. Minton, Balch & Company.
- Fechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule der Aesthetik. Breitkopf & Härtel.
- Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2011). Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS ONE, 6(7), e21852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021852
- Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft [Critique of judgment]. Lagarde und Friederich.
- Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
- Leder, H., & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of art appreciation: Review and perspectives. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084
- Scherer, K. R., & Coutinho, E. (2013). How music creates emotion: A multifactorial approach. In T. Cochrane, B. Fantini, & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), The emotional power of music: Multidisciplinary perspectives on musical arousal, expression, and feeling (pp. 121–145). Oxford University Press.
- Silvia, P. J. (2005). Emotional responses to art: From collation to appraisal. Review of General Psychology, 9(4), 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.4.342
- Vessel, E. A., Starr, G. G., & Rubin, N. (2012). The brain on art: Intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 66. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00066
- Vessel, E. A., Starr, G. G., & Rubin, N. (2013). Art reaches within: Analytic aesthetic experiences engage the self-relevance network. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00258