NeurobiologyNeurosciencePharmacologyPhysiology

AMPA: Engine of Fast Synaptic Transmission

An in-depth academic examination of the AMPA receptor, detailing its molecular structure, fast synaptic transmission kinetics, role in synaptic plasticity, and clinical relevance.

memjavad
PUBLISHED
Scientifically Reviewed · Dr. Marwa Abd-Alazim · October 7, 2026
Medically & Scientifically Reviewed Verified: October 7, 2026
Dr. Marwa Abd-Alazim Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology • University of Kerbala
Review Criteria & Clinical Standards

This content undergoes rigorous scientific peer-review and medical editorial standards at Arab Psychology Network to ensure clinical accuracy, validity, and compliance with evidence-based guidelines from leading psychological and healthcare authorities (APA / WHO).

Fast excitatory neurotransmission across the central nervous system constitutes the fundamental substrate of cognition, sensory processing, and behavioral adaptation. At the core of this electrophysiological machinery lies the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor, universally designated by the acronym AMPA. Understanding the structural architecture, channel kinetics, and dynamic trafficking of this ionotropic glutamate receptor provides an indispensable window into how neurobiological networks encode memory, maintain plasticity, and succumb to neurological pathology.

AMPA Receptor: Architecture of Excitatory Neurotransmission

1. Concise Definition

An AMPA receptor (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor, or AMPAR) is a subtype of ionotropic transmembrane receptor for the neurotransmitter glutamate that mediates the vast majority of fast excitatory synaptic transmission throughout the vertebrate central nervous system. Upon binding presynaptically released L-glutamate, AMPA receptors undergo rapid conformational alterations that open an integral nonselective cation pore, permitting the inward flux of sodium ions and generating an excitatory postsynaptic potential.

Beyond serving as baseline conduits of rapid electrochemical communication, AMPA receptors act as primary execution units in neuroplastic adaptation. Their dynamic insertion into and endocytic removal from the postsynaptic density govern the amplification or dampening of synaptic strength. Consequently, these receptors represent the structural and functional bedrock of synaptic plasticity paradigms such as long-term potentiation and long-term depression, establishing the biophysical mechanism through which neural circuits store experiential information.

2. Etymology & Linguistic Origin

The term “AMPA” is an acronym derived from the synthetic agonist that selectively distinguishes this receptor family from other ionotropic glutamate receptors: α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid. Linguistically, the nomenclature traces back to systematic chemical taxonomy: the Greek letter α (alpha) designates the position of the amine group relative to the carboxylic acid moiety; amino originates from ammonia (ultimately tracing to the Egyptian deity Ammon via the sal ammoniac deposits near his temple); and isoxazole denotes an azole ring containing neighboring oxygen and nitrogen atoms.

Prior to the synthesis and pharmacological characterization of this specific synthetic agonist in the late 1970s and early 1980s by Danish medicinal chemist Povl Krogsgaard-Larsen and colleagues, these biological targets were generically labeled “quisqualate receptors” due to their responsiveness to the natural plant-derived toxin quisqualic acid. However, because quisqualate also exhibited potent affinity for metabotropic glutamate receptors, the discovery of the highly selective synthetic isoxazole derivative AMPA led the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (IUPHAR) to officially adopt the acronym AMPA as the definitive classification for this ionotropic glutamate receptor subclass.

3. Pronunciation & Grammatical Form

In academic, clinical, and laboratory settings, the term is pronounced phonetically as an acronym: /ˈæm.pə/ (AM-puh) or spelled out as letters (/ˌeɪ.ɛm.piːˈeɪ/). When referencing the receptor itself, researchers commonly append the noun to yield “AMPA receptor” or use the standard portmanteau “AMPAR” (pronounced /ˈæm.pɑːr/).

Grammatically, “AMPA” functions as a proper noun when designating the synthetic chemical compound, and as an attributive noun or adjective when modifying biological entities such as “AMPA receptor,” “AMPA channel,” “AMPA subunit,” or “AMPA-mediated current.” The plural form of the acronym is rendered as “AMPAs” or “AMPARs,” while associated pharmacological agents are categorized grammatically as “AMPA agonists,” “AMPA antagonists,” or “positive allosteric modulators of AMPA receptors.”

4. Detailed Conceptual Explanation

The functional execution of cognitive operations depends upon the precisely timed generation of electrical currents across neuronal membranes. When an action potential depolarizes a presynaptic axon terminal within an excitatory circuit, vesicular fusion releases millimolar concentrations of glutamate into the narrow synaptic cleft. Glutamate molecules diffuse across this intercellular space within microseconds to engage AMPA receptors clustered within the postsynaptic density. The binding of glutamate initiates an ultrafast structural reconfiguration, opening a central pore that allows sodium (Na+) to surge into the cell down its electrochemical gradient, while permitting potassium (K+) to exit. This net inward positive current depolarizes the dendritic membrane, forming an excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC).

The kinetic hallmark of AMPA receptors is exceptional speed. Activation occurs within hundreds of microseconds, and channel deactivation upon transmitter clearance takes place in fewer than two milliseconds. Furthermore, AMPA receptors exhibit profound desensitization: even in the continued presence of glutamate, the channel gate closes rapidly as the ligand-binding domain transitions into an energetically favorable non-conducting conformation. This rapid kinetic profile ensures that excitatory transmission operates with high temporal precision, allowing neural networks to follow high-frequency inputs without entering a state of sustained, non-responsive depolarization block.

The electrophysiological properties of AMPA receptors diverge sharply from their ionotropic partners, the NMDA receptors. While NMDA receptors require both glutamate binding and membrane depolarization to dislodge a resting magnesium (Mg2+) ion pore block, AMPA receptors operate independently of baseline voltage. Consequently, AMPA receptors serve as the initial depolarizing trigger: their inward sodium flux provides the positive potential shift required to expel the magnesium block from neighboring NMDA channels, unmasking their calcium conductance and setting the molecular cascades of learning into motion.

Structurally, all functional AMPA receptors operate as tetramers composed of combinations of four distinct subunits: GluA1, GluA2, GluA3, and GluA4 (formerly designated GluR1 through GluR4). Each individual subunit displays a modular topology comprised of four distinct domains: an extracellular amino-terminal domain (ATD) involved in receptor assembly and trans-synaptic adhesion; a clamshell-like ligand-binding domain (LBD) containing the agonist pocket; a transmembrane domain consisting of three membrane-spanning helices (M1, M3, M4) and a re-entrant pore loop (M2); and an intracellular carboxyl-terminal (C-terminal) tail. The dynamic regulation of these C-terminal tails dictates receptor interaction with scaffold proteins, intracellular signaling cascades, and endocytic machinery.

5. Historical Development

The systematic deciphering of AMPA receptors represents a transformative narrative within late twentieth-century neuropharmacology. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, Curtis, Watkins, and colleagues established that acidic amino acids like L-glutamate exerted excitatory effects upon central neurons, although the scientific consensus initially dismissed glutamate as a non-specific metabolic intermediary rather than a true neurotransmitter. By the late 1970s, pharmacological experiments utilizing natural toxins such as kainic acid and quisqualic acid demonstrated that distinct receptor populations mediated these excitatory actions.

A critical breakthrough arrived in 1982 when Povl Krogsgaard-Larsen synthesized α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid, demonstrating its unprecedented selectivity for the non-NMDA receptor population responsible for the primary fast component of excitatory transmission. This pharmacological tool enabled researchers to clearly differentiate fast ionotropic currents from the slower NMDA-mediated components discovered by Jeffrey Watkins.

The molecular biology revolution of the late 1980s and early 1990s dramatically clarified the structural basis of AMPA receptors. In 1989, a research team led by Michael Hollmann, Stephen Heinemann, and colleagues successfully cloned the first glutamate receptor subunit, GluR1 (now GluA1), using functional expression cloning in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Shortly thereafter, the remaining subunits (GluA2, GluA3, and GluA4) were identified and sequenced by the laboratories of Heinemann and Peter Seeburg. These findings established that diverse combinations of these homologous proteins yielded native receptors with distinct kinetics and ionic permeabilities.

In 2009, Eric Gouaux and his team achieved a structural milestone by solving the full-length X-ray crystal structure of a homotetrameric GluA2 receptor in an antagonist-bound state. This landmark study published in Nature unveiled the precise two-fold symmetric “Y-shaped” quaternary architecture of the receptor, demonstrating how symmetry transitions occur between the amino-terminal domain, ligand-binding core, and transmembrane pore. Subsequent high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) studies have since elucidated the structural dynamics of AMPA receptors complexed with auxiliary subunits, documenting conformational states during activation, desensitization, and positive allosteric modulation.

6. Theoretical Foundations

The theoretical paradigm linking AMPA receptors to cognitive neuroscience rests upon Donald Hebb’s postulate of associative synaptic plasticity, formulated in 1949. Hebb proposed that when two neurons fire simultaneously, the metabolic or structural efficiency of their connection increases. In the modern biophysical realization of this hypothesis, AMPA receptors function as the primary physical parameter that changes during synaptic strengthening. The quantitative density and phosphorylation state of postsynaptic AMPA receptors directly calibrate synaptic weight within computational models of artificial and biological neural networks.

Under the prevailing model of long-term potentiation (LTP), high-frequency presynaptic stimulation causes sustained glutamate release that strongly activates baseline AMPA receptors. The resulting membrane depolarization unblocks NMDA receptors, allowing an influx of calcium ions into the dendritic spine. This localized surge of calcium activates calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII). Activated CaMKII phosphorylates existing AMPA receptors (notably at Serine 831 of GluA1) to elevate single-channel conductance and mobilizes intracellular pools of AMPA receptors stored in recycling endosomes, inserting them directly into the postsynaptic density.

Conversely, theories of homeostatic synaptic scaling demonstrate that neurons actively adjust their global excitability to prevent runaway saturation or complete silence. Synaptic scaling relies on the coordinated, cell-wide up-regulation or down-regulation of surface AMPA receptors in response to chronic alterations in overall circuit firing rates. This global adaptation ensures that relative differences in individual synaptic weights established through Hebbian mechanisms remain intact while the total firing output of the neuron stays bounded within a functional dynamic range.

7. Key Components, Types & Dimensions

Native AMPA receptors exhibit enormous functional and pharmacological diversity driven by subunit stoichiometry, post-transcriptional RNA processing, and interaction with auxiliary proteins:

  • GluA1 Subunit: Characterized by a long intracellular C-terminal domain, GluA1 is essential for activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. It contains regulatory phosphorylation sites (such as Ser831 and Ser845) that direct receptor insertion into synapses during LTP. Homomers or heteromers lacking GluA2 are calcium-permeable.
  • GluA2 Subunit and the Q/R Filter: GluA2 is the critical master regulator of AMPA receptor biophysics. Nearly 100% of endogenous GluA2 pre-mRNA undergoes post-transcriptional adenosine-to-inosine nuclear RNA editing catalyzed by ADAR2, which swaps a neutral glutamine (Q) codon for a positively charged arginine (R) at position 607 within the pore loop. Receptors containing edited GluA2(R) are completely impermeable to calcium (Ca2+) and display linear current-voltage relationships resistant to intracellular polyamine block. Receptors lacking edited GluA2 are calcium-permeable (CP-AMPARs), exhibit inward rectification, and contribute substantially to activity-dependent plasticity and excitotoxicity.
  • GluA3 and GluA4 Subunits: GluA3 subunits possess short C-termini and participate in constitutive, activity-independent receptor cycling under baseline conditions. GluA4 subunits exhibit long C-termini and show high expression during early postnatal development, facilitating rapid synaptogenesis and early critical periods of circuit wiring.
  • Alternative Splicing (Flip and Flop): Every GluA subunit exists in two alternative splice variants, termed “flip” and “flop,” located in a 38-amino-acid segment immediately preceding the fourth transmembrane domain. Flip isoforms desensitize more slowly and show higher steady-state currents, whereas flop isoforms display rapid desensitization kinetics and predominate in mature circuits to sharpen temporal responsiveness.
  • Auxiliary Subunits (TARP and Beyond): Native AMPA receptors rarely exist in isolation; they assemble with transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins (TARPs, such as Stargazin/γ-2), cornichon homologs (CNIH-2/3), and GSG1L. These auxiliary partners alter channel gating, slow deactivation, boost single-channel conductance, and anchor the channel complex to postsynaptic scaffolding elements such as PSD-95.

8. Examples & Illustrative Cases

The clinical and physiological roles of AMPA receptors become starkly visible when receptor function is disrupted by pharmacological interventions, genetic variations, or autoimmune responses:

In the context of behavioral learning, consider the classic model of Pavlovian fear conditioning in rodent models. When an animal learns to associate an auditory tone with a mild foot shock, synapses linking the auditory thalamus and cortex to the lateral amygdala undergo structural LTP. Patch-clamp recordings taken from these amygdala neurons reveal a marked increase in the amplitude of AMPA-mediated miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs). Pharmacological infusion of the selective AMPA receptor antagonist CNQX directly into the amygdala completely prevents both the acquisition and the expression of the conditioned fear response, demonstrating that AMPA-mediated transmission is indispensable for executing the learned emotional output.

A profound human clinical illustration occurs in Anti-AMPA Receptor Encephalitis, a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by circulating autoantibodies directed against the extracellular epitopes of the GluA1 or GluA2 subunits. Patients, frequently women presenting with hidden thymic, lung, or breast neoplasms, develop severe limbic encephalitis marked by acute memory loss, confusion, psychiatric symptoms (including psychosis and aggression), and intractable epileptic seizures. Translational research demonstrates that these patient-derived antibodies cause cross-linking and rapid internalization of surface AMPA receptors, stripping synapses of their primary excitatory machinery and triggering cognitive collapse.

9. Measurement & Assessment

Investigating AMPA receptor functionality demands an array of electrophysiological, imaging, and biochemical methodologies spanning molecular to systems levels:

Whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology stands as the definitive standard for evaluating AMPA receptor activity in acute brain slices and cultured neurons. By holding the postsynaptic membrane potential at -70 mV and applying pharmacological blockers for NMDA receptors (e.g., APV) and GABAA receptors (e.g., picrotoxin or bicuculline), investigators isolate AMPA-mediated EPSCs. Measuring the ratio of the AMPA current at negative potentials versus the NMDA current at positive potentials (+40 mV) yields the standardized AMPA/NMDA ratio, an established physiological metric for quantifying baseline synaptic strength and LTP induction.

To assess receptor trafficking and membrane expression directly, researchers employ cell-surface biotinylation assays followed by Western blot analysis, alongside high-resolution optical microscopy. Advanced imaging tools, such as Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) and single-particle tracking using quantum dots, permit real-time visualization of individual AMPA receptor tetramers diffusing laterally across the lipid bilayer between extrasynaptic pools and the postsynaptic density. Furthermore, positron emission tomography (PET) tracers, such as [11C]K-2, have recently been developed to image and quantify AMPA receptor distribution in the living human brain, opening new diagnostic avenues for neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders.

10. Applications & Practical Significance

Given their central role in mediating fast neurotransmission throughout the central nervous system, AMPA receptors serve as key therapeutic targets across pharmacology, neurology, and biological psychiatry:

In the domain of epilepsy, unconstrained AMPA-mediated excitation promotes seizure initiation and widespread propagation across cortical networks. The non-competitive AMPA receptor antagonist perampanel (trade name Fycompa) is approved as an effective anti-seizure medication for refractory focal-onset and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. By allosterically blocking the receptor’s ion channel pore, perampanel suppresses excessive neuronal firing and controls pathological synchronization.

Conversely, therapeutic strategies for cognitive impairment and treatment-resistant depression frequently focus on amplifying AMPA receptor signaling. Positive allosteric modulators (AMPAKINES) bind to allosteric sites on the receptor complex to delay desensitization and deactivation without opening the channel directly. These agents augment natural synaptic currents, enhance brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) synthesis, and promote synaptic plasticity. Furthermore, the rapid and sustained antidepressant actions of ketamine and its enantiomer esketamine are critically dependent on downstream AMPA receptor activation: ketamine’s preferential blockade of NMDA receptors on inhibitory GABAergic interneurons prompts a burst of glutamate release that selectively stimulates postsynaptic AMPARs, rapidly triggering the synaptogenic mTOR signaling cascade.

11. Research & Empirical Evidence

Decades of empirical investigation have consolidated our understanding of AMPA receptor dynamics in brain function and systemic neuropathology:

Seminal investigations by Roberto Malinow, Richard Huganir, and Roger Nicoll firmly established the receptor insertion hypothesis of synaptic plasticity. Malinow and colleagues demonstrated through fluorescently tagged constructs that GluA1-containing AMPA receptors are driven into synaptic spines in response to LTP-inducing stimuli, whereas GluA2/GluA3 heteromers cycle continuously through constitutive recycling pathways to preserve steady-state synaptic transmission. Subsequent knockout studies confirmed that mice deficient in the GluA1 gene (Gria1-/-) exhibit a complete absence of hippocampal CA1 LTP in adult slices and show specific deficits in spatial working memory, confirming the subunit’s non-redundant behavioral role.

Research into stroke and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) highlights the pathological consequences of dysfunctional AMPA receptor subunit regulation. Studies led by Peter Seeburg and colleagues illustrated that down-regulation or inefficient editing of the GluA2 subunit leads to an overabundance of calcium-permeable AMPA receptors (CP-AMPARs). Following cerebral ischemia, an influx of calcium through unedited or GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors initiates toxic intracellular cascades, mitochondrial stress, free radical generation, and delayed neuronal death. In sporadic ALS, motor neurons exhibit marked deficits in ADAR2-mediated GluA2 editing, leaving these vulnerable cells uniquely susceptible to glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity.

12. Cultural & Cross-Cultural Considerations

While the molecular structure and biophysical properties of the AMPA receptor are evolutionary universals across human populations, biomedical research into AMPA receptor genetics and pharmacology intersects directly with cross-cultural paradigms and global health disparities.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) analyzing diverse global cohorts have revealed variations across the human GRIA gene family (which encodes subunits GluA1 through GluA4) associated with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and autism spectrum conditions. However, the historic overrepresentation of populations of European descent in neurogenetic databases creates challenges when translating genetic risk profiles to non-European ancestral groups. Furthermore, the clinical utilization of advanced AMPA-targeting pharmacotherapies, such as perampanel for refractory epilepsy, is heavily shaped by healthcare resource availability: while high-income nations routinely integrate novel ionotropic modulators into specialized clinical practice, low- and middle-income regions remain largely reliant on first-generation anti-seizure drugs due to pricing constraints and drug availability.

13. Criticisms, Debates & Limitations

Despite significant empirical advancements, several intense controversies and scientific debates continue to surround AMPA receptor biology:

A prominent debate in neurophysiology concerns the exact role of calcium-permeable AMPA receptors (CP-AMPARs) during the initiation and maintenance of long-term potentiation. While one school of thought argues that transient incorporation of CP-AMPARs is an obligatory initial phase required to trigger full synaptic consolidation, competing laboratories present contradictory evidence indicating that conventional GluA2-containing, calcium-impermeable receptors are fully sufficient to mediate potentiation under physiological conditions. Discrepancies in experimental protocols, temperature control, animal age, and pharmacological selectivity of channel blockers (such as IEM-1460 and NASPM) fuel ongoing disagreement.

Another challenge involves the therapeutic application of positive AMPA modulators (ampakines) as nootropic and neuroprotective agents. While ampakines consistently improve synaptic plasticity and cognitive performance in preclinical rodent assays, translating these compounds into safe human treatments has proven exceptionally difficult. Because AMPA receptors are distributed ubiquitously across the neuroaxis, excessive positive modulation carries an inherent risk of inducing excitotoxicity, precipitating spontaneous seizures, and exacerbating neuroinflammatory damage, leaving an exceptionally narrow therapeutic window for clinical utility.

14. Related Terms & Distinctions

To avoid conceptual confusion within neurobiology and neuropharmacology, the AMPA receptor must be clearly differentiated from related receptor classes and signaling molecules:

  • NMDA Receptor (NMDAR): An ionotropic glutamate receptor that exhibits high calcium permeability and a voltage-dependent magnesium (Mg2+) block at resting potentials. Unlike the rapidly gating AMPA receptor that mediates immediate baseline transmission, the NMDA receptor operates as a coincidence detector requiring simultaneous depolarization and glutamate binding to open.
  • Kainate Receptor (KAR): A distinct family of ionotropic glutamate receptors assembled from GluK1–GluK5 subunits. Kainate receptors display slower gating kinetics, play distinct modulatory roles in presynaptic neurotransmitter release, and generate smaller postsynaptic currents compared to AMPA receptors.
  • Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors (mGluRs): G-protein coupled receptors (mGluR1 through mGluR8) that bind glutamate to trigger intracellular second-messenger cascades rather than directly opening an integral ion channel pore. While AMPA receptors trigger microsecond-scale ion fluxes, mGluRs orchestrate slower, longer-lasting biochemical modulation.
  • Transmembrane AMPA Receptor Regulatory Proteins (TARPs): Auxiliary, non-pore-forming transmembrane proteins (e.g., Stargazin) that assemble directly alongside AMPA receptor tetramers to stabilize them at the cell membrane, modulate channel opening times, and link them to postsynaptic density scaffolds.

15. Summary & Key Takeaways

The AMPA receptor represents the foundational engine of fast excitatory transmission across the vertebrate nervous system. Operating as a ligand-gated ion channel composed of GluA1–GluA4 subunits, the receptor responds to presynaptic glutamate within sub-millisecond timescales, depolarizing the postsynaptic membrane to facilitate real-time neural computation.

Beyond mediating standard synaptic communication, the dynamic trafficking and subunit composition of AMPA receptors—most notably regulated by the critical Q/R editing of the GluA2 subunit—serve as the core substrate for synaptic plasticity, learning, and homeostatic adaptation. Continued structural, biophysical, and clinical investigations into AMPA receptors promise to expand our understanding of human cognition and drive targeted therapeutics for epilepsy, depression, and neurodegenerative disorders.

References

  • Bredt, D. S., & Nicoll, R. A. (2003). AMPA receptor trafficking at excitatory synapses. Neuron, 40(2), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00640-8
  • Collingridge, G. L., Isaac, J. T., & Wang, Y. T. (2004). Receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(12), 952–962. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1556
  • Hollmann, M., & Heinemann, S. (1994). Cloned glutamate receptors. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 17(1), 31–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.17.030194.000335
  • Sobolevsky, A. I., Rosconi, M. P., & Gouaux, E. (2009). X-ray structure, symmetry and mechanism of an AMPA-subtype glutamate receptor. Nature, 462(7274), 745–756. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08624
  • Traynelis, S. F., Wollmuth, L. P., McBain, C. J., Menniti, F. S., Vance, K. M., Ogden, K. K., Hansen, K. B., Yuan, H., Myers, S. J., & Dingledine, R. (2010). Glutamate receptor ion channels: Structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacological Reviews, 62(3), 405–496. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.109.002451

Cite This Article

memjavad (2026, October 7). AMPA: Engine of Fast Synaptic Transmission. PSYCHOLOGICAL DATABASE. https://en.arabpsychology.com/dictionary/ampa-receptor-fast-synaptic-transmission/
memjavad. “AMPA: Engine of Fast Synaptic Transmission.” PSYCHOLOGICAL DATABASE, 7 October 2026, https://en.arabpsychology.com/dictionary/ampa-receptor-fast-synaptic-transmission/.
memjavad. “AMPA: Engine of Fast Synaptic Transmission.” PSYCHOLOGICAL DATABASE. October 7, 2026. https://en.arabpsychology.com/dictionary/ampa-receptor-fast-synaptic-transmission/.