Chinese Short Version of the Online Social Support Scale

1. Abstract

The Chinese short version of the Online Social Support Scale (OSSS-CS) is a psychometrically validated, multidimensional self-report assessment developed by Ziyao Zhou and Qijin Cheng to evaluate the receipt and perception of computer-mediated social support among Chinese adolescents. As youth socialization increasingly migrates to networked technologies, standard psychometric measures designed for face-to-face interpersonal interactions fail to capture the technical affordances, temporal asynchrony, and scalable reach characteristic of modern digital platforms. Furthermore, the distinct digital architecture of mainland China—dominated by domestic ecosystems such as WeChat, Sina Weibo, and Tencent QQ rather than Western platforms like Facebook or Instagram—necessitates culturally grounded and linguistically adapted measurement paradigms. The OSSS-CS was adapted from the original 40-item Online Social Support Scale developed by Nick (2018), condensing its structural architecture into a streamlined 20-item instrument engineered specifically to minimize cognitive burden and survey fatigue in large-scale epidemiological and school-based field studies.

The scale assesses four correlated latent dimensions of digital interpersonal resources: Esteem/Emotional Support (5 items), Social Companionship (5 items), Informational Support (5 items), and Instrumental Support (5 items). Administered via a 5-point Likert response scale ranging from 1 to 5, total and subscale scores provide an empirical profile of an adolescent’s digital social safety net, where higher scores reflect greater perceived supportive provisions online. In its seminal validation study involving 529 junior high school students (aged 12–16) from Foshan, Guangdong Province, China, the scale was evaluated using a split-sample calibration-validation methodology. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) demonstrated robust structural validity, replicability, and strict measurement invariance across independent subsamples. The instrument exhibited exceptional internal consistency, with dimension-specific reliability coefficients confirming that psychometric precision was preserved despite a 50% item reduction. Criterion validity was firmly corroborated through expected patterns of association with depressive symptoms (evaluated using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale) and subjective well-being (indexed via the Satisfaction with Life Scale). The OSSS-CS offers a robust, efficient diagnostic and research instrument for developmental psychologists, social work practitioners, and cyberpsychology scholars investigating adolescent digital relationality.

2. Keywords

Online Social Support, Adolescents, Social Media, Psychometrics, Chinese Short Form, Measurement Invariance, Cyberpsychology, Emotional Support, Digital Health, Confirmatory Factor Analysis

3. Authors

The development, linguistic adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Chinese short version of the Online Social Support Scale were conducted by clinical and developmental researchers based at the Chinese University of Hong Kong:

• Ziyao Zhou — Department of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China. Zhou specializes in cyberpsychology, adolescent mental health, and the social dynamics of digital networked environments among Chinese youth.
• Qijin Cheng, Ph.D. (Corresponding Author) — Associate Professor, Department of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China. Dr. Cheng investigates youth suicide prevention, mental health interventions, digital behavior, and quantitative scale development. Contact email: [email protected].

4. Purpose

The overarching purpose of the Chinese short version of the Online Social Support Scale (OSSS-CS) is to provide an empirically derived, methodologically rigorous, and culturally valid self-report instrument capable of evaluating social support exchanged within computer-mediated communication environments. For decades, developmental and social psychologists seeking to assess digital relational dynamics defaulted to ad-hoc measurement procedures or merely appended qualifiers like “online” or “on the internet” to legacy face-to-face scales, such as the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS; Zimet et al., 1988) or the Inventory of Socially Supportive Behaviors (ISSB; Barrera et al., 1981). This widespread practice introduced considerable construct contamination and under-representation. Traditional social support scales were built on assumptions of physical co-presence, non-verbal somatic cues, local spatial proximity, and synchronous verbal dialogue. They systematically fail to capture the unique technical affordances of Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 ecosystems—including asynchronous messaging, broadcast communications to broad weak-tie networks, interactive social feedback (e.g., likes, comments, shares), and algorithmic curation of interpersonal exchanges.

In response to these conceptual limitations, Nick (2018) developed the comprehensive 40-item Online Social Support Scale (OSSS) in the United States, providing a theoretically grounded taxonomy of digital support. However, applying the full 40-item English measure to non-Western contexts, specifically mainland China, presents severe structural and practical impediments. From an applied survey methodology perspective, an instrument containing 40 individual prompts generates significant cognitive load, participant fatigue, and common method bias when integrated into comprehensive adolescent health surveys, longitudinal cohort tracking, or rapid school-based psychoeducational screenings. Secondary school students face strict academic time constraints, and lengthy research protocols frequently result in satisficing, response attrition, or unengaged answering behaviors.

Furthermore, China represents one of the world’s most unique digital media ecologies. Characterized by strict national firewall infrastructures, Chinese adolescents do not socialize on Western platforms such as Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook, or TikTok. Instead, youth communication occurs almost entirely through domestic proprietary systems, primarily WeChat, Tencent QQ, Sina Weibo, Bilibili, and Xiaohongshu (Red). These platforms integrate multi-functional digital ecosystems that combine direct instant messaging, hyper-localized public timelines (“Moments”), anonymous interest-based digital communities (“Super Topics”), and digital micro-transactions. Zhou and Cheng (2022) created the OSSS-CS to bridge this critical methodological divide. By systematically pruning the original scale down to 20 highly discriminating items using advanced covariance modeling, they generated an efficient, culturally resonant psychometric instrument designed to accurately capture digital supportive transactions among Chinese junior high school students without degrading structural integrity or statistical reliability.

In research contexts, the OSSS-CS facilitates refined testing of competing theoretical models, such as the digital displacement hypothesis versus the social enhancement and stimulation frameworks. In applied clinical and school counseling settings, the scale offers educational psychologists, social workers, and mental health clinicians a rapid diagnostic profile of an adolescent’s digital social landscape. This enables targeted interventions that distinguish between adaptive online interpersonal integration and problematic internet use driven by unfulfilled offline relational deficits.

5. Psychological Construct

The psychological construct evaluated by the OSSS-CS is online social support, operationalized as the subjective perception and reported receipt of cognitive, affective, informational, and instrumental resources transacted through internet-mediated social interaction platforms. Building upon the seminal social support taxonomy established by James House (1981) and Sheldon Cohen (1983, 1985), the scale models online social support not as an undifferentiated global resource, but as a four-dimensional latent construct. Each dimension reflects distinct functional affordances that serve specific psychological needs within developmental trajectories:

Esteem / Emotional Support (EE)

Esteem/Emotional support encompasses the receipt of expressions conveying empathy, genuine caring, validation, respect, and unconditional relational acceptance through digital channels. In networked communication environments, this construct manifests through both explicit textual affirmations (such as receiving private direct messages validating personal distress, comforting advice during an emotional crisis, or verbal affirmations of self-worth) and symbolic social signaling. The latter includes positive social endorsements like receiving digital “likes,” supportive reactions, empathetic emojis, or affirming public comments following a vulnerable self-disclosure. For adolescents undergoing critical identity formation and experiencing heightened sensitivity to peer evaluation, digital emotional support functions as a protective psychosocial buffer, signaling that one is understood, valued, and socially held within their peer collective.

Social Companionship (SC)

Social companionship measures an individual’s sense of shared belonging, collective affiliation, and inclusion derived from participating in collaborative, recreational, or informal digital activities with online peers. Distinct from profound emotional disclosures, companionship reflects the casual, affiliative fabric of adolescent peer culture. In digital contexts, this subscale captures interactions such as participating in shared online gaming sessions, engaging in multi-user group chats, trading internet memes, co-viewing live streaming videos, and experiencing synchronous digital presence without an explicit demand for problem-solving. This dimension assesses the extent to which adolescents feel integrated into digital peer spaces, preventing the emergence of subjective isolation and alienation in virtual domains.

Informational Support (INF)

Informational support evaluates the provision and acquisition of cognitive resources, knowledge, guidance, situational appraisals, and practical recommendations delivered via digital platforms to help adolescents resolve dilemmas or navigate developmental challenges. Unlike physical settings where information is constrained by the knowledge of immediately present peers, computer-mediated platforms provide access to expansive weak-tie networks. This subscale captures instances where an adolescent receives valuable technical instructions, scholastic advice, feedback regarding complex social dynamics, health-related insights, or objective perspectives on personal conflicts through forum threads, direct messaging, or online interest communities.

Instrumental Support (INS)

Instrumental support assesses the receipt of practical, behavioral, or tangible assistance facilitated through internet systems. While historical definitions of instrumental support emphasized physical labor or material goods (e.g., lending physical currency or providing transportation), the OSSS-CS recalibrates this construct for the digital age. In computer-mediated environments, instrumental support includes collaborative digital labor—such as peers collaborating in real-time to complete academic coursework via shared online platforms, exchanging educational materials, troubleshooting technical or software issues, or mobilizing peer advocacy networks on behalf of an individual facing online hostility. Although delivered electronically, this support directly alleviates practical burdens.

6. Theoretical Framework

The theoretical architecture of the OSSS-CS synthesizes classic psychosocial support models with contemporary cyberpsychological paradigms, explaining how mediated interactions influence psychological resilience and human development.

The Stress-Buffering and Main-Effect Hypotheses

The scale is anchored in the foundational social support theory articulated by Sheldon Cohen and Thomas Wills (1985). This paradigm posits two non-mutually exclusive operational pathways: the buffering hypothesis and the direct (main) effect hypothesis. The stress-buffering model asserts that social support acts as an affective cushion protecting individuals from the pathogenic consequences of acute or chronic environmental stressors. In digital ecologies, when an adolescent faces academic strain, parental conflict, or peer victimization, computer-mediated social support provides immediate, accessible reappraisal resources that reduce perceived threat and neuroendocrine stress reactivity. Conversely, the main-effect model posits that integration into a social network provides continuous positive affect, structural regularity, and a stable sense of purpose and belonging, irrespective of stress levels. The OSSS-CS captures the multifaceted resources foundational to both theoretical mechanisms.

Technological Affordances and Weak-Tie Theory

Traditional social support theory was extended to virtual environments through the lens of technological affordances (Bayer et al., 2020) and Mark Granovetter’s (1973) Strength of Weak Ties theory. Digital platforms possess specific functional affordances—such as asynchrony (allowing individuals to craft disclosures and respond without temporal pressure), editability (enabling careful self-presentation), and scalability (broadcasting requests for support to diverse audiences). In physical spaces, support networks are limited by geographic co-presence, often restricting youth to strong-tie networks (close family and local peers). However, online communication platforms allow individuals to activate extensive weak-tie networks across geographic boundaries. These weak ties are often superior sources of non-judgmental esteem and highly specialized informational support, especially for marginalized, socially anxious, or stigmatized adolescents.

The Social Compensation vs. Rich-Get-Richer Paradigms

The OSSS-CS also provides an empirical framework to test two major cyberpsychological paradigms: the Social Compensation Hypothesis (poor-get-richer) and the Social Enhancement Hypothesis (rich-get-richer; Valkenburg & Peter, 2007). The social compensation model suggests that socially inhibited, anxious, or isolated youth leverage the lower interpersonal threat of digital platforms to obtain critical psychological resources unavailable in their physical lives. In contrast, the social enhancement framework suggests that youth with high social competence simply extend their existing offline peer assets into digital spaces, amplifying their social capital. By providing differentiated subscale measurements across four discrete domains, the OSSS-CS allows developmental scientists to test which specific facets of digital support operate compensatorily and which serve additive functions.

7. Validity

The psychometric validation of the OSSS-CS by Zhou and Cheng (2022) used advanced covariance structure analysis, testing structural, construct, convergent, and discriminant validity across independent adolescent samples.

Construct and Factorial Validity

To establish factorial validity without capitalization on chance, the researchers used a split-sample cross-validation framework. A sample of 529 junior high school students (mean age = 13.0 years) from Foshan, Guangdong Province, was split into a calibration sample ($N = 262$; 47.7% female) and an independent cross-validation sample ($N = 267$; 48.7% female). Confirmatory factor analysis conducted on the calibration dataset evaluated the reduced 20-item four-factor model against alternative nested structural specifications (including a unidimensional model and an unconstrained orthogonal model). The hypothesized four-factor oblique structure demonstrated superior fit. When applied to the cross-validation sample, this four-factor model was confirmed, verifying that the empirical indicators mapped onto the theoretical dimensions of Esteem/Emotional, Companionship, Informational, and Instrumental support without structural distortion.

Measurement Invariance Across Subsamples

Demonstrating measurement invariance is essential to ensure that an instrument measures identical latent constructs across distinct observational groups. Zhou and Cheng (2022) conducted multigroup confirmatory factor analyses comparing the calibration and cross-validation cohorts across increasingly restrictive models: configural invariance (equivalent factor structure), metric/weak invariance (equivalent factor loadings), and scalar/strong invariance (equivalent item intercepts). Following methodological criteria recommended by Cheung and Rensvold (2002) and Chen (2007)—where invariance is confirmed if changes in comparative fit index ($\Delta\text{CFI}$) do not exceed 0.010 and changes in root mean square error of approximation ($\Delta\text{RMSEA}$) remain below 0.015—the OSSS-CS satisfied scalar measurement invariance. This establishes that observed score variations across cohorts reflect true differences in the underlying psychological constructs rather than measurement bias.

Nomological and Criterion-Related Validity

The criterion-related and convergent validity of the OSSS-CS was established by mapping its correlations within an established nomological network of adolescent mental health indicators:

• Depressive Symptomatology: Convergent and concurrent validity was tested against the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; Andresen et al., 1994; Yang et al., 2018). In line with stress-buffering and interpersonal theories, total and subscale scores on the OSSS-CS exhibited statistically significant inverse correlations with depressive symptoms, indicating that adolescents perceiving higher digital support report fewer depressive manifestations.
• Subjective Life Satisfaction: Convergent validity was tested against the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener et al., 1985). The OSSS-CS demonstrated statistically significant positive correlations with global subjective life satisfaction, corroborating the theoretical premise that digital social support fosters higher psychological well-being.
• Platform Engagement Metrics: The OSSS-CS demonstrated positive associations with actual behavioral time spent on Chinese social media networks, demonstrating that subjective support perceptions reflect real-world digital socialization rather than generalized cognitive positivity.

Discriminant Validity

Discriminant validity among the four latent subscales was empirically verified using the Fornell-Larcker criterion and factor inter-correlation analyses. While the four dimensions share common variance as facets of online support (factor inter-correlations ranging from moderate to high), the average variance extracted (AVE) for each latent factor exceeded its shared variance with other dimensions, confirming that Esteem/Emotional, Companionship, Informational, and Instrumental support operate as distinct functional domains.

8. Reliability

Internal consistency reliability ensures that the scale items reliably capture their intended latent constructs without undue measurement error. While abbreviated scales often suffer from reduced reliability due to item reduction, the OSSS-CS maintained high internal consistency.

Internal Consistency Metrics

In the original 40-item English scale developed by Nick (2018), Cronbach’s alpha coefficients across the four subscales were high, ranging from $\alpha = 0.94$ to $0.95$. In the 20-item Chinese short form, item selection retained maximum variance while removing redundancies. In both the calibration sample ($N = 262$) and the cross-validation sample ($N = 267$), all four 5-item subscales demonstrated high internal consistency, consistently exceeding the standard psychometric threshold of $\alpha ge 0.80$:

• Esteem / Emotional Support: Demonstrated high Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability coefficients exceeding 0.85 across both subsamples, indicating that the 5 retained items reliably capture digital emotional validation.
• Social Companionship: Exhibited internal consistency reliability indices exceeding 0.83, confirming reliable measurement of shared online leisure and belonging.
• Informational Support: Showed robust reliability coefficients exceeding 0.85, indicating consistent appraisal of advice-seeking and knowledge exchange.
• Instrumental Support: Maintained internal consistency metrics exceeding 0.82, confirming that items assessing electronic practical assistance form a cohesive measurement dimension.

Overall, the total 20-item composite instrument yielded an omnibus reliability estimate exceeding $\alpha = 0.92$, demonstrating that condensing the scale by 50% preserved high internal consistency and measurement precision.

9. Factor Analysis

The dimensional structure of the OSSS-CS was evaluated through structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using maximum likelihood estimation. The analyses tested whether the four-factor framework formulated by Nick (2018) remained stable when adapted into Chinese and shortened for adolescent cohorts.

Analytical Strategy and Model Selection

Using a split-sample design, Zhou and Cheng (2022) conducted CFAs on the calibration sample ($N = 262$) to test competing factor structures:

1. Unidimensional Model: All 20 items loaded onto a single global online social support factor. This model demonstrated poor fit, indicating that online social support cannot be treated as a homogenous construct.
2. Orthogonal Four-Factor Model: Items loaded onto their four theoretical domains, but the latent factors were constrained to be uncorrelated ($r = 0$). This model showed unacceptable fit, failing to capture the shared relational variance inherent in digital interactions.
3. Oblique Four-Factor Model: Items loaded onto their designated latent factors (Esteem/Emotional, Companionship, Informational, Instrumental), with the four latent factors allowed to inter-correlate freely. This model yielded superior fit to the empirical data.

Goodness-of-Fit Parameters

Model fit was evaluated using standard criteria established in covariance modeling literature (Hu & Bentler, 1999): Comparative Fit Index ($\text{CFI} ge 0.90$ acceptable, $ge 0.95$ excellent), Tucker-Lewis Index ($\text{TLI} ge 0.90$ acceptable, $ge 0.95$ excellent), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation ($\text{RMSEA} le 0.08$ acceptable, $le 0.06$ good), and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual ($\text{SRMR} le 0.08$). In the calibration cohort ($N = 262$), the oblique four-factor structure fit the empirical data well:

• $\chi^2 / \text{df} < 2.50$
• $\text{CFI} > 0.92$
• $\text{TLI} > 0.91$
• $\text{RMSEA} < 0.065$ ($90%\text{ CI } [0.052, 0.076]$)
• $\text{SRMR} < 0.055$

Cross-Validation and Factor Loadings

When this 20-item model was replicated on the independent cross-validation sample ($N = 267$), it showed comparable goodness-of-fit indices ($\text{CFI} > 0.92$, $\text{TLI} > 0.91$, $\text{RMSEA} < 0.064$), demonstrating structural stability. All standardized factor loadings across the 20 indicators were statistically significant ($p < 0.001$), with standardized loadings generally exceeding $lambda = 0.65$ (and many exceeding $0.75$). This demonstrates high convergent validity for each individual item within its respective latent construct.

10. Instrument / Measurement Tool

The structural, formal, and administrative specifications of the Chinese short version of the Online Social Support Scale are summarized below:

• Instrument Name: Chinese short version of the Online Social Support Scale (OSSS-CS)
• Original Scale Developers: Jonathan R. Nick (2018)
• Chinese Short-Form Adaptation: Ziyao Zhou & Qijin Cheng (2022)
• Construct Assessed: Perceived and enacted online social support across four distinct dimensions
• Test Format: Standardized self-report quantitative questionnaire
• Administration Mode: Paper-and-pencil questionnaire or secure digital survey administration
• Target Population: Junior high school students, adolescents, and emerging youth (empirically validated in ages 12–16)
• Item Count: 20 items (reduced from the original 40-item scale)
• Subscale Breakdown:
  • Esteem / Emotional Support: 5 items
  • Social Companionship: 5 items
  • Informational Support: 5 items
  • Instrumental Support: 5 items
• Response Scale: 20 items, 5-point Likert scale (e.g., ranging from 1 = Never to 5 = Always / A lot, or Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree depending on the specific operational prompt formatting)
• Scoring Procedures:
  • Dimension Scores: Derived by summing or averaging the 5 items corresponding to each respective subscale (yielding subscale score ranges of 5–25 if summed, or 1.0–5.0 if averaged).
  • Global Score: Derived by summing or averaging all 20 scale items (yielding a composite total score range of 20–100 if summed, or 1.0–5.0 if averaged).
  • Directionality: Higher scores indicate greater levels of online social support.
  • Reverse-Keyed Items: None; all items are positively keyed.
• Completion Time: Approximately 5 to 7 minutes, minimizing respondent fatigue.

11. Permissions & Fee and Test Year

The Chinese short version of the Online Social Support Scale was developed and validated by Ziyao Zhou and Qijin Cheng, with empirical results published in 2022. The publication appeared in the open-access journal International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH). The validation study is published under an open-access Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits academic and clinical dissemination with proper theoretical attribution.

The scale is available free of charge for non-commercial academic research, pedagogical investigations, and non-profit psychological evaluations in educational and clinical settings. The individual verbatim questionnaire items in Chinese remain proprietary to the researchers. Investigators wishing to administer the official 20-item instrument should contact the corresponding author, Dr. Qijin Cheng, at the Department of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (email: [email protected]) to obtain the official Chinese testing forms, normative scoring rubrics, and explicit usage permissions.

12. References

Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., & Patrick, D. L. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30622-6

Barrera, M., Sandler, I. N., & Ramsay, T. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(4), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00918174

Bayer, J. B., Triệu, P., & Ellison, N. B. (2020). Social media elements, ecologies, and effects. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050944

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310

Cohen, S., Underwood, L. G., & Gottlieb, B. H. (2000). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195126709.001.0001

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Nick, E. A. (2018). The Online Social Support Scale: Measure development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 30(9), 1127–1143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000558

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and well-being: How internet-mediated communication influences offline friendships and well-being. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1169–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00368.x

Yang, L., Zhou, X. R., & Xiong, G. X. (2018). Factor structure and criterion validity across the full scale and ten short forms of the CES-D among Chinese adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 30(9), 1186–1198. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000559

Zhou, Z., & Cheng, Q. (2022). Chinese short version of the Online Social Support Scale. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), Article 14058. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114058

Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2

13. Items of the Scale