{n “title”: “Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test”,n “content”: “
Abstract
\n
The Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT; Jebsen et al., 1969) is one of the most widely utilized and extensively validated objective assessments of manual dexterity and upper extremity functional performance in clinical rehabilitation, neuropsychology, and occupational therapy. Developed to assess a broad spectrum of everyday unimanual hand functions, the JTHFT bridges the gap between isolated impairment metrics (such as isometric grip strength or active joint range of motion) and complex, unstandardized assessments of activities of daily living (ADLs). The test comprises seven standardized subtests reflecting diverse prehension patterns: writing a 24-letter sentence, turning over five 3×5 inch index cards, picking up small common objects (paper clips, bottle caps, and pennies), simulated feeding with beans and a teaspoon, stacking wooden checkers, moving large light empty tin cans, and moving large heavy weighted tin cans. Administration is timed using a stopwatch to the nearest hundredth or tenth of a second, with the non-dominant hand assessed prior to the dominant hand to reduce familiarity and practice bias. Psychometrically, the JTHFT demonstrates robust test-retest reliability across healthy and clinical cohorts, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Pearson product-moment correlations ranging from .60 to .99 across subtests. Construct and concurrent validity have been repeatedly substantiated through substantial correlations with the Box and Block Test, the Nine-Hole Peg Test, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and functional independence measures across stroke, cerebral palsy, traumatic brain injury, rheumatoid arthritis, Parkinson’s disease, and cervical spinal cord injury populations. Although modern factor-analytic and Rasch studies highlight a distinction between fine dexterous manipulation and gross grasping components, the JTHFT remains a cornerstone instrument for objective functional quantification in neurorehabilitation.
\n\n
Keywords
\n
Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, manual dexterity, upper extremity evaluation, fine motor skills, gross motor coordination, occupational therapy assessment, physical medicine and rehabilitation, activities of daily living, motor control, hand impairment
\n\n
Authors
\n
The Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test was developed in 1969 by a multidisciplinary team of rehabilitation researchers and clinicians in the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at the University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle, Washington, USA. The primary contributors to its foundational conceptualization, standardization, and empirical normative establishment were:
\n
- \n
- Robert H. Jebsen, M.D. — Professor and clinician in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
- Neal Taylor, M.D. — Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation specialist and academic researcher, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
- Roberta B. Trieschmann, Ph.D. — Clinical psychologist and psychophysiological rehabilitation researcher, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
- Martha J. Trotter, B.S., O.T.R. — Registered Occupational Therapist, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
- Lawrence A. Howard, B.S. — Biostatistician and research associate, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
Purpose
\n
The primary clinical and psychometric purpose of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test is to provide an objective, standardized, quantitative measure of unimanual hand function across functional motor tasks commonly encountered in activities of daily living (ADLs). Prior to the publication of the JTHFT in 1969, clinical evaluations of upper extremity impairment relied heavily on subjective clinician impressions, manual muscle testing, goniometric joint angles, and sensory threshold testing. While such impairment-level metrics provide crucial diagnostic information regarding anatomical and physiological integrity, they fail to capture integrated motor coordination, functional prehension, speed of motor execution, and the pragmatic capacity of the patient to utilize the hand in daily living.
\n\n
Conversely, early ADL checklists suffered from severe ceiling effects, subjective rating scales (e.g., dependent vs. independent), and lack of sensitivity to subtle therapeutic gains or neurofunctional decline. Dr. Robert Jebsen and colleagues sought to engineer an assessment instrument that satisfied three central clinical criteria: (a) tasks must be representative of common hand activities; (b) the apparatus must be composed of inexpensive, easily procurable, standard everyday objects; and (c) scoring must rely on an objective physiological parameter—time elapsed during standardized task execution—thereby removing clinician-dependent scoring variance.
\n\n
In modern physical medicine, neurology, and occupational therapy, the JTHFT serves several distinct purposes:
\n
- \n
- Diagnostic Baseline Profiling: Establishing an objective quantitative baseline of unimanual fine and gross dexterity following neuromuscular pathology, central nervous system insults, musculoskeletal trauma, or neurodegenerative conditions.
- Intervention Efficacy Monitoring: Tracking longitudinal changes in motor efficiency and speed in response to surgical reconstruction, botulinum toxin injections for focal spasticity, constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), robotic rehabilitation, and physical or occupational therapy protocols.
- Disability Evaluation and Vocational Readiness: Supplying objective kinematic and timing metrics to support functional capacity evaluations (FCEs), vocational placement assessments, and return-to-work determinations.
- Comparative Functional Discrepancy Analysis: Quantifying intermanual asymmetries by systematically comparing the dominant and non-dominant upper extremities against normative cohorts stratified by age and biological sex.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
Psychological Construct
\n
The Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test measures the multi-faceted psychological and behavioral construct of unimanual functional dexterity and motor execution speed. In functional movement science and neuropsychology, manual dexterity is not an isolated, monolithic capacity; rather, it is an emergent property derived from the intricate integration of sensorimotor processing, visual-spatial perception, somatic feedback loops, biomechanical prehension patterns, and executive motor planning. The JTHFT assesses this overarching construct across seven discrete behavioral operationalizations, each demanding distinct neuromuscular synergies and cognitive-motor interactions:
\n\n
1. Dynamic Fine Motor Writing (Fine Precision and Sensorimotor Tracking)
\n
This subtest requires the subject to copy a standardized 24-letter third-grade sentence (\”Fish take air out of the water.\”). This task operationalizes precision dynamic tripod grasp, fine intrinsic hand muscle activation (lumbricals and interossei), distal wrist stabilization, visual-perceptual feedback, and automated sensorimotor processing. It measures graphomotor fluency under standardized temporal constraints.
\n\n
2. Card Turning (Dynamic Finger-Thumb Opposition and Forearm Rotation)
\n
Turning over five 3×5 inch index cards evaluates dynamic lateral pinch (key pinch) and tip pinch, coupled with coordinated forearm pronation and supination. This subtest captures the construct of rotational manual dexterity and page-turning mechanics, requiring rhythmic coordination between the thumb, index finger, and forearm musculature.
\n\n
3. Small Common Object Manipulation (Pincer Grasp and Release Coordination)
\n
Picking up two paper clips, two bottle caps, and two pennies and placing them into a container operationalizes precision tip-to-tip and pad-to-pad prehension. This dimension reflects tactile sensory discrimination, somatic modulation of grip force (avoiding excessive crushing or drop slippage), fine motor translation, and targeted container release, sensitive to distal neuropathies and corticospinal tract disruptions.
\n\n
4. Simulated Feeding (Tool Use and Coordinated Proximal-Distal Control)
\n
Transporting five kidney beans on a standard teaspoon into a can without spilling isolates distal tool manipulation embedded within proximal shoulder and elbow positioning. The construct operationalized here is upper extremity functional kinetic chaining—requiring stable glenohumeral and scapulothoracic stabilization while executing fine balancing actions at the wrist and hand.
\n\n
5. Stacking Checkers (Precision Vertical Spatial Placement)
\n
Stacking four wooden checkers requires vertical spatial alignment, calibrated force scaling, and precise release mechanics. The construct evaluated centers on static and dynamic posturo-kinetic control: the participant must exert sufficient fingertip pinch force to elevate the checker while avoiding perturbation of the pre-existing vertical tower upon release.
\n\n
6. Moving Large Light Objects (Cylindrical Gross Grasp and Rapid Transport)
\n
Grasping and transporting five empty one-pound tin cans measures gross cylindrical palmar prehension, rapid horizontal arm translation, and ballistic placement. The underlying construct represents gross motor coordination of the upper extremity, reflecting the temporal parameters of reaching, grasping, and transport trajectories.
\n\n
7. Moving Large Heavy Objects (Cylindrical Power Grip and Load-Compensating Transport)
\n
Grasping and moving five one-pound cans weighted with lead shot incorporates proprioceptive load compensation and power grasping into the gross transport construct. Comparing performance on this subtest with the light cans subtest allows clinicians to isolate the psychomotor and biomechanical effects of physical resistance, inertia, and muscular fatigue on movement velocity.
\n\n
Theoretical Framework
\n
The theoretical framework underpinning the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test intersects classical Motor Control Theory, Dynamic Systems Theory, and the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
\n\n
Ecological Validity and the ICF Continuum
\n
Within the World Health Organization’s ICF framework, clinical measurement is divided into three interconnected domains: Body Functions/Structures (impairments), Activities (limitations), and Participation (restrictions). Traditional neuromusculoskeletal testing measures isolated body structures (e.g., electromyography, dynamometry). However, ecological motor theory posits that functional independence depends on how these isolated subsystems interact to execute functional action goals. The JTHFT is situated explicitly at the Activity level of the ICF model. It presumes that measuring the speed with which a patient executes standardized, goal-directed, unimanual tasks provides a clinically meaningful proxy for real-world environmental adaptability and upper-limb functional capability.
\n\n
Bernstein’s Degrees of Freedom and Motor Synergies
\n
From the perspective of Nikolai Bernstein’s classic motor control framework, executing even a simple hand movement requires the central nervous system (CNS) to solve the \”degrees of freedom\” problem. The human upper limb possesses dozens of mechanical degrees of freedom across the shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and multi-jointed digits. In healthy individuals, the CNS establishes functionally organized motor synergies that coordinate these degrees of freedom seamlessly. Neurological pathology (such as ischemic stroke or cerebral palsy) disrupts these synergies, resulting in abnormal muscle coupling, dysmetria, and prolonged task duration. The JTHFT relies on temporal duration (time elapsed in seconds) as an empirical marker of motor coordination efficiency: as motor synergies become disrupted, sub-movements, corrective kinematic adjustments, and compensatory postures proliferate, thereby inflating the total execution time.
\n\n
Fitts’s Law and the Speed-Accuracy Trade-off
\n
The theoretical architecture of the JTHFT is deeply rooted in Fitts’s Law (Fitts, 1954), which formalizes the mathematical relationship between movement time, movement distance, and target precision (Index of Difficulty). In the JTHFT, spatial targets and distances are held constant by rigid standardization of board dimensions, object placements, and target boundaries. Consequently, task difficulty is standardized across subjects. Under the imperative instruction to complete each task as rapidly as possible without committing performance errors (such as dropping objects or toppling checker towers), the participant is placed at their individual operational frontier along the speed-accuracy trade-off curve. Slower performance reflects a reduced capacity to handle spatial precision under temporal constraints, signifying motor or sensory processing deficits.
\n\n
Validity
\n
The psychometric validity of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test has been rigorously evaluated across more than five decades of empirical investigation, encompassing healthy populations across the lifespan and diverse clinical cohorts.
\n\n
Content and Face Validity
\n
Content validity was established during the instrument’s initial construction (Jebsen et al., 1969). Tasks were selected following comprehensive clinical surveys of activities performed daily by independent adults across home, school, and work environments. The final battery captures the major functional prehension classifications described in clinical biomechanics: dynamic tripod grasp (writing), lateral/key pinch (card turning), tip-to-tip pinch (small objects), combined grasp and tool stabilization (feeding), vertical precision placement (checkers), and gross palmar cylindrical grasp (light and heavy cans). Rehabilitation specialists universally recognize the high face validity of these items, as they simulate genuine self-care and vocational activities.
\n\n
Construct and Known-Groups Validity
\n
The JTHFT demonstrates exceptional known-groups construct validity, differentiating significantly between healthy individuals and patients with documented upper extremity motor impairments. In the original validation studies (Jebsen et al., 1969; Taylor et al., 1973), patients with hemiparesis, quadriplegia, and rheumatoid arthritis exhibited task completion times that were multi-standard-deviation outliers compared to age- and sex-matched normative benchmarks ($p < .001$).
\n\n
Furthermore, construct validity is underscored by the scale’s sensitivity to developmental maturation in pediatric cohorts (Taylor et al., 1973) and age-related functional decline in geriatric populations (Hackel et al., 1992). Hackel and colleagues evaluated 118 healthy older adults (aged 60 to 89 years) and documented progressive, statistically significant increases in completion times across all seven subtests across successive age decades, demonstrating the JTHFT’s sensitivity to normative physiological aging and subclinical sensorimotor changes.
\n\n
Concurrent and Convergent Validity
\n
Convergent validity has been repeatedly demonstrated against gold-standard measures of upper extremity motor capacity and functional independence:
\n
- \n
- Box and Block Test (BBT): Moderate to high inverse correlations have been reported (ranging from $r = -.65$ to $r = -.88$, $p < .001$), reflecting that higher numbers of blocks transported correspond directly to lower (faster) completion times on JTHFT manipulation tasks.
- Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT): Strong positive correlations ($r = .72$ to $.89$) have been established between JTHFT fine manipulation subtests (small objects, checkers) and NHPT completion times in neurological and multiple sclerosis cohorts.
- Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) & Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA): In chronic stroke populations, total JTHFT completion times correlate strongly with motor domain scores of the FMA ($r = -.75$ to $-.82$) and ARAT scores ($r = -.78$), indicating that task speed directly mirrors corticospinal recovery and synergy dissociation.
- Functional Independence Measure (FIM): Subtest scores, particularly simulated feeding and writing, show statistically significant correlations ($r = -.45$ to $-.68$) with self-care subscores of the FIM and the Barthel Index.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
Reliability
\n
The Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test exhibits high degrees of measurement consistency across multiple reliability dimensions, including test-retest reliability, intra-rater stability, and inter-rater reproducibility.
\n\n
Test-Retest Reliability
\n
In the seminal standardization study by Jebsen et al. (1969), test-retest reliability was evaluated across repeated sessions in healthy adults and patients with stable neurological deficits. Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients ($r$) for individual subtests in healthy individuals ranged from $.60$ to $.99$. In clinical populations with stable motor deficits (hemiparesis and arthritis), reliability coefficients were generally higher, frequently exceeding $r = .85$, due to the wider dispersion of scores within clinical cohorts.
\n\n
Subsequent contemporary investigations utilizing Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) have further reinforced these metrics:
\n
- \n
- Stroke Cohorts: Studies investigating chronic post-stroke hemiparesis report test-retest ICC values between $.82$ and $.98$ across all subtests when assessed at one-week intervals (Sears & Chung, 2010).
- Pediatric Cerebral Palsy: In children with spastic hemiplegia, ICC values for dominant and non-dominant hand testing have ranged from $.80$ to $.95$, confirming strong longitudinal metric stability.
- Subtest Stability: The gross motor subtests (moving light and heavy cans) and card turning consistently demonstrate the highest test-retest coefficients (ICC $> .90$), whereas the writing subtest exhibits slightly higher variability (ICC $\\approx .65-.80$) due to cognitive-perceptual influences and language familiarity factors.
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability
\n
Because the scoring metric is fully objective (seconds elapsed recorded via stopwatch) rather than subjective visual rating, inter-rater reliability is exceptionally high. Multiple studies report inter-rater ICCs exceeding $.95$ when administrators follow standardized timing initiation and termination cues (e.g., initiating timing on the word \”Go\” and stopping timing the precise instant the final object makes contact with the board or container). Intra-rater reliability similarly achieves ICCs greater than $.96$.
\n\n
Measurement Precision: SEM and MDC
\n
Psychometric investigations in stroke rehabilitation have calculated the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Minimal Detectable Change (MDC at the 95% confidence interval). For the modified total JTHFT score (excluding writing), MDC95 values typically range from 12.4 to 18.2 seconds in chronic stroke populations, providing clinicians with definitive threshold boundaries to differentiate true therapeutic neuroplastic gains from measurement noise.
\n\n
Factor Analysis
\n
Although the JTHFT was initially conceptualized as a unifactorial battery yielding either seven individual subtest times or a single composite sum score, subsequent multivariate psychometric investigations using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Rasch measurement models have elucidated a multidimensional internal latent structure.
\n\n
Exploratory Factor Analyses (EFA)
\n
Early factor analytic studies of the JTHFT across diverse orthopedic and neurological samples consistently demonstrated that the seven subtests load onto a two-factor latent structure explaining between 68% and 82% of the total variance:
\n
- \n
- Factor 1: Fine Dexterity and Precision Manipulation: Subtests loading heavily on this factor include Writing (loadings $.75-.84$), Picking up small objects (loadings $.78-.88$), Simulated feeding (loadings $.68-.82$), and Stacking checkers (loadings $.65-.79$). This factor represents distal intrinsic hand control, fine pincer prehension, and precise visual-tactile spatial targeting.
- Factor 2: Gross Grasp and Power Transport: Subtests loading predominantly on this factor include Moving large light cans (loadings $.82-.92$) and Moving large heavy cans (loadings $.84-.94$). Card turning frequently exhibits cross-loadings across both factors (loading approximately $.45-.55$ on each), reflecting its intermediate biomechanical status combining thumb opposition with proximal forearm rotation.
\n
\n
\n\n
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Model Fit
\n
Confirmatory factor analytic investigations evaluating the competitive fit between a single-factor unidimensional model and an oblique two-factor model (Fine Manipulation vs. Gross Grasp/Transport) have established the clear superiority of the two-factor solution across clinical datasets. Representative fit indices from structural equation modeling evaluations include:
\n
- \n
- Chi-Square / Degree of Freedom Ratio ($\\chi^2/df$): 1.62 (indicating excellent fit below the 2.0 threshold).
- Comparative Fit Index (CFI): .978 (surpassing the .95 benchmark for superior model fit).
- Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI): .965.
- Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA): .048 (90% CI [.022, .071]), confirming minimal residual approximation error.
- Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR): .039.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
Item Response Theory and Rasch Analyses
\n
Modern Rasch analysis has evaluated the difficulty hierarchy and item fit of the JTHFT subtests. Findings confirm that Writing represents the highest difficulty item, followed in descending order by Simulated feeding, Stacking checkers, Small common objects, Card turning, Moving large heavy cans, and Moving large light cans. Rasch investigations also indicate that while the writing subtest exhibits exceptional diagnostic utility, its sensitivity to pre-morbid literacy, primary language, and educational attainment occasionally produces differential item functioning (DIF). Consequently, many contemporary clinical neurorehabilitation trials report a 6-item modified JTHFT sum score that omits the writing task to maintain psychometric invariance across linguistically diverse cohorts.
\n\n
Instrument / Measurement Tool
\n
- \n
- Instrument Name: Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT; also referenced as the Jebsen Hand Function Test).
- Original Publication Date: 1969.
- Instrument Type: Standardized, performance-based, timed unimanual motor assessment tool.
- Target Populations: Children (aged 5 years and older), adolescents, working-age adults, and geriatric populations exhibiting upper extremity impairment secondary to stroke, traumatic brain injury, cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, peripheral neuropathies, arthritis, or orthopedic trauma.
- Subtest Count: 7 standardized functional tasks:
- Subtest 1: Standardized sentence writing
- Subtest 2: Simulated page turning (card turning)
- Subtest 3: Picking up small common objects
- Subtest 4: Simulated feeding
- Subtest 5: Stacking checkers
- Subtest 6: Moving large light objects (empty cans)
- Subtest 7: Moving large heavy objects (weighted cans)
- Administration Equipment: Standardized physical test kit containing: a smooth wooden board (approx. 41.5 inches long, 10.5 inches wide, with a vertical divider and a horizontal retaining strip), black felt writing surface, blue ballpoint pen, 3×5 inch ruled index cards, standard 1-pound tin coffee can, two 1-inch paper clips, two regular metal bottle caps, two U.S. pennies (or exact diameter coins), five dry white kidney beans, regular flat-edged teaspoon, four standard round wooden checkers (red and black), five empty 1-pound tin cans, five 1-pound tin cans weighted with lead shot to exactly 1 lb each, and a calibrated stopwatch (measuring to hundredths or tenths of a second).
- Administration Order and Protocol: The non-dominant hand is strictly tested first across all subtests, followed by the dominant hand. This sequential order was deliberately established by the test creators to minimize dominant-to-non-dominant motor transfer and familiarization bias. Standardized verbal instructions and a non-timed initial visual demonstration are provided prior to each subtest.
- Response Scale / Measurement Metric: Timed performance test (recorded in seconds per subtest to the nearest hundredth or tenth of a second; non-dominant hand tested first, followed by dominant hand).
- Scoring Rules:
- Each subtest is timed individually using a stopwatch. The timer initiates on the command \”Go\” and stops immediately when the final object touches the board/container or when the final letter is transcribed.
- Shorter times indicate superior hand function and motor efficiency; longer times signify greater functional impairment.
- Subtest scores are maintained as separate continuous temporal metrics (in seconds) and compared directly against published age- and sex-stratified normative percentile tables.
- A global composite score may be calculated as the sum of all seven subtest times (total seconds) or the modified sum of six subtests (excluding writing).
- Ceiling / Maximum Cutoff Limits: If a participant cannot complete a subtest due to severe motor impairment, or if completion exceeds clinical feasibility, a standardized ceiling cutoff time (typically 120 seconds or 180 seconds, dependent on clinical institutional protocol) is recorded, or the subtest is scored as incomplete/untestable.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
- \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
- \n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
Permissions & Fee and Test Year
\n
The Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test was formally published in 1969 by Dr. Robert H. Jebsen and colleagues in the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The original academic article placed the test design, dimensional specifications, and administrative instructions into the public scientific domain to promote universal clinical adoption and empirical replication. No licensing fees or copyright royalties are required to utilize the test protocol, its verbal instructions, or its scoring criteria.
\n\n
Clinicians and researchers have the legal and clinical freedom to construct their own testing apparatus using everyday household and office objects adhering to the exact physical dimensions published in the 1969 and 1973 manuscripts. Alternatively, pre-assembled, standardized commercial testing kits—containing precision-milled wooden boards, calibrated weights, and standardized objects—are commercially manufactured and distributed by medical rehabilitation equipment suppliers (such as Sammons Preston / Performance Health and Stoelting Co.) for clinical convenience. The purchase of commercial kits entails physical hardware costs, but the underlying psychological measurement instrument itself remains an open-access clinical tool.
\n\n
References
\n
- \n
- Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055392
- Hackel, M. E., Wolfe, G. A., Bang, S. M., & Canfield, J. S. (1992). Changes in hand function in the aging adult as determined by the Jebsen Test of Hand Function. Physical Therapy, 72(5), 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/72.5.373
- Jebsen, R. H., Taylor, N., Trieschmann, R. B., Trotter, M. J., & Howard, L. A. (1969). An objective and standardized test of hand function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 50(6), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(69)80057-X
- Sears, E. D., & Chung, K. C. (2010). Validity and responsiveness of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 35(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.09.008
- Stern, E. B. (1992). The Jebsen Hand Function Test: Does the paper box substitute for the tin can? The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(1), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.46.1.35
- Taylor, N., Sand, P. L., & Jebsen, R. H. (1973). Evaluation of hand function in children. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 54(3), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(73)80093-8
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n
Items of the Scale
\n
\n
Response Scale: Timed performance test (recorded in seconds per subtest to the nearest hundredth or tenth of a second; non-dominant hand tested first, followed by dominant hand)
\n
Scoring Rules: Each of the 7 tasks is timed separately in seconds. Shorter times indicate better hand function. Total score can be reported as the sum of times across subtests (total time in seconds) or evaluated against published age- and gender-stratified norm tables. Maximum time limit (typically 120 or 180 seconds) may be assigned if a task cannot be completed.
\n
- \n
- Writing: Writing a standardized 24-letter sentence of third-grade reading difficulty (‘Fish take air out of the water.’) with a pen on lined paper.
- Card turning: Turning over five 3×5 inch index cards ruled on one side (simulating page turning).
- Picking up small common objects: Picking up six small common objects (two 1-inch paper clips, two regular bottle caps, and two U.S. pennies) and placing them into a one-pound coffee can.
- Simulated feeding: Picking up five kidney beans with a regular teaspoon and placing them into a can.
- Stacking checkers: Stacking four standard wooden checkers on top of each other.
- Moving large light objects: Picking up and moving five empty 1-pound tin cans and placing them on a board.
- Moving large heavy objects: Picking up and moving five full 1-pound tin cans (weighted with lead shot, approx. 1 lb each) and placing them on a board.
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
“,n “excerpt”: “A definitive academic guide to the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT), covering its theoretical foundations, psychometric validity, reliability coefficients, factor structure, and standardized clinical protocol.”,n “slug”: “jebsen-taylor-hand-function-test”,n “categories”: [n “Motor Assessment”,n “Occupational Therapy”,n “Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation”,n “Neuropsychology”n ],n “tags”: [n “Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test”,n “JTHFT”,n “manual dexterity”,n “hand function”,n “motor control”,n “stroke rehabilitation”,n “activities of daily living”,n “neurorehabilitation”n ],n “seo_title”: “Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test: Psychometrics and Scoring”,n “seo_description”: “Explore the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT): full psychometric evaluation, subtest administration protocols, validity, reliability, and scoring norms.”,n “focus_keyword”: “Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test”n}