Adolescent Mental HealthClinical AssessmentPsychometrics

Kutcher Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder Scale for Adolescents (K-GSADS-A)

The Kutcher Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder Scale for Adolescents (K-GSADS-A) is a comprehensive clinician-rated psychometric instrument designed to evaluate symptom severity and monitor treatment change across fear, avoidance, affective, and somatic domains in youth aged 11 to 17.

memjavad
PUBLISHED
Scientifically Reviewed · Dr. Marwa Abd-Alazim · September 16, 2026
Medically & Scientifically Reviewed Verified: September 16, 2026
Dr. Marwa Abd-Alazim Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology University of Kerbala
Review Criteria & Clinical Standards

This content undergoes rigorous scientific peer-review and medical editorial standards at Arab Psychology Network to ensure clinical accuracy, validity, and compliance with evidence-based guidelines from leading psychological and healthcare authorities (APA / WHO).

Abstract

The Kutcher Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder Scale for Adolescents (K-GSADS-A) is a specialized clinician-rated psychometric instrument designed to assess symptom severity and monitor longitudinal therapeutic change in pediatric populations aged 11 to 17 years diagnosed with social anxiety disorder (SAD; previously termed social phobia). Originally devised in 1999 by child and adolescent psychiatrist Dr. Stanley Kutcher in collaboration with multidisciplinary clinical teams, the scale addressed a critical methodological void: the absence of sensitive, clinician-administered evaluative rating instruments tailored specifically to the developmental realities of adolescent social distress during clinical trials. Structurally, the instrument comprises three distinct components: Section A evaluates fear and behavioral avoidance across 18 standardized social interaction and performance scenarios; Section B captures idiographic fear and avoidance across three patient-nominated worst-case scenarios; and Section C quantifies 11 core affective and somatic manifestations of autonomic arousal. Items are scored on a four-point Likert-type severity metric (0 = never/none to 3 = severe). Psychometric investigations during a landmark 16-week multinational pediatric psychopharmacology trial demonstrated robust evaluative properties, yielding internal consistency estimates (Cronbach’s α) ranging from .74 to .96 across repeated assessment waves. Test-retest reliability across a 4-week placebo-controlled interval demonstrated an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of .64. Convergent validity is evidenced by high correlations with both clinician-rated benchmarks, such as the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Adolescents (LSAS-CA), and self-report measures like the Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory (SPAI), while divergent validity is confirmed through weak associations with depressive symptom metrics. The K-GSADS-A is widely recognized for its high treatment sensitivity and practical utility across randomized controlled trials and specialized adolescent psychiatric services.

Keywords

Kutcher Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder Scale for Adolescents, K-GSADS-A, social anxiety disorder, pediatric psychometrics, clinician-rated scale, behavioral avoidance, somatic distress, adolescent mental health, treatment sensitivity, evaluative rating scale

Authors

The scale was developed by Dr. Stanley Kutcher, MD, FRCPC, an internationally recognized Canadian psychiatrist, researcher, and former Sun Life Financial Chair in Adolescent Mental Health at Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Dr. Kutcher, who was later appointed to the Senate of Canada in recognition of his contributions to adolescent mental health policy and literacy, created the instrument alongside clinical research teams comprised of child and adolescent psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and pediatric psychiatric nurses. The formal empirical validation of the scale was published in collaboration with S. J. Brooks (Brooks & Kutcher, 2004).

Purpose

The primary clinical and psychometric objective of the K-GSADS-A is to furnish an objective, clinician-rated assessment tool optimized for monitoring evaluative change in adolescents with generalized social anxiety disorder over time. During the late 1990s, clinical research in pediatric psychopharmacology and cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy was hindered by a reliance on adult-derived measurement paradigms or purely diagnostic self-report screeners. These legacy tools frequently lacked the developmental nuance required to gauge the phenotypic expression of social anxiety in youth, such as peer group dynamics, academic oral presentations, dining in communal school cafeterias, and authority-figure interactions.

Diagnostic instruments (e.g., structured psychiatric interviews) determine the presence or absence of categorical criteria but are fundamentally insensitive to continuous, granular fluctuations in symptom severity induced by therapeutic interventions. The K-GSADS-A was engineered precisely to bridge this gap. Rather than acting as a static categorical screening tool, it functions as a dynamic evaluative tracking instrument capable of measuring therapeutic response across four distinct physiological, behavioral, and cognitive domains: situational fear, situational avoidance, generalized affective distress, and autonomic/somatic reactivity.

In clinical trials and tertiary clinical environments, the K-GSADS-A allows clinicians to synthesize observational data, adolescent self-disclosure, and collateral reports (such as parent observations) into a unified psychometric profile. It enables researchers to identify whether pharmacotherapeutic agents (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) or structured psychotherapies preferentially alleviate subjective apprehension versus behavioral avoidance, offering critical insights into mechanisms of treatment response.

Psychological Construct

The K-GSADS-A operationalizes the multidimensional construct of generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD) in youth aged 11 to 17. Social anxiety in developmental cohorts is not a monolithic affective state; rather, it is a complex, transactional syndrome consisting of cognitive apprehension, behavioral flight/avoidance, acute affective distress, and peripheral somatic nervous system hyperarousal.

1. Social and Performance Fear/Anxiety

This dimension assesses the intensity of perceived cognitive apprehension, dread, and subjective distress elicited by everyday adolescent social environments. These situations encompass both formal performance challenges (e.g., giving a book report in front of peers, reading aloud in class) and informal interactional scenarios (e.g., initiating a conversation with an unfamiliar peer, attending school dances, speaking to teachers or store clerks). The adolescent anticipates catastrophic scrutiny, fear of negative evaluation, embarrassment, or interpersonal rejection, which triggers acute discomfort.

2. Social and Behavioral Avoidance

Avoidance represents the core behavioral maintaining mechanism of social anxiety. This subscale measures the operational frequency and severity with which the adolescent actively evades, escapes, or refuses exposure to social situations. In developmental populations, avoidance manifests uniquely as school absenteeism, refusal to participate in group projects, isolation during lunch breaks, refusal to answer phone calls, or relying on “safety behaviors” (such as looking down, wearing concealing clothing, or remaining silent) to navigate unavoidable social encounters.

3. Affective Distress

The affective domain reflects generalized emotional turbulence, demoralization, anticipation-related misery, and feelings of inadequacy tied directly to the social phobic state. It captures pervasive dread occurring prior to entering social arenas (anticipatory anxiety), pervasive emotional instability during interactional challenges, and post-event cognitive rumination (“post-event processing”), wherein the adolescent repeatedly re-evaluates their perceived performance in a hypercritical manner.

4. Somatic Distress

Autonomic and visceral hyperarousal forms a cardinal component of pediatric social phobia. This dimension captures peripheral sympathetic manifestations, including blushing, palpitations, tremors, diaphoresis, gastrointestinal upset (nausea, abdominal cramping), and muscle tension. Adolescents frequently fear these somatic symptoms directly, operating under the catastrophic assumption that visible shaking or blushing will reveal their internal vulnerability and invite severe peer derision.

Theoretical Framework

The architectural design of the K-GSADS-A aligns directly with contemporary cognitive-behavioral models of social phobia, particularly the theoretical paradigms pioneered by David M. Clark and Adrian Wells (1995), alongside the cognitive-behavioral framework formulated by Richard Rapee and Ronald Heimberg (1997). These models posit that individuals with social phobia, upon anticipating or entering an evaluative social context, experience a marked shift in attentional processing toward internal threat cues, generating a negative mental representation of the self as seen by the audience.

From a developmental psychopathology perspective, adolescence represents a critical neurodevelopmental window marked by rapid reorganization of social-cognitive brain networks, particularly within the frontostriatal and limbic circuitries. Peer relationships become primary determinants of social standing, self-esteem, and identity formation. Consequently, sensitivity to peer rejection and social evaluation peaks during early-to-mid adolescence. When processing biases (attentional bias to threat, catastrophic interpretation of ambiguous social feedback) interact with an exaggerated autonomic stress response, generalized social anxiety disorder emerges.

The K-GSADS-A operationalizes these cognitive, physiological, and behavioral feedback loops. When an adolescent encounters an evaluative situation, cognitive appraisal generates severe subjective distress (Fear/Anxiety score). This psychological state instantly triggers visceral autonomic activation (Somatic Distress score), which fuels intense subjective terror (Affective Distress score). To eliminate this acute discomfort, the adolescent adopts maladaptive coping strategies, specifically behavioral avoidance (Avoidance score). However, avoidance prevents emotional habituation and disconfirmation of erroneous beliefs, perpetually consolidating the disorder.

Validity

The evaluative validity of the K-GSADS-A was established in a rigorous 16-week multinational pediatric psychopharmacotherapy clinical trial (Brooks & Kutcher, 2004) encompassing adolescent cohorts across the United States, Canada, South Africa, and Belgium, with subsequent international cross-cultural validations.

Convergent Validity

Convergent validity was substantiated by examining Pearson and Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the K-GSADS-A and established pediatric and adult anxiety measures. The K-GSADS-A Total Score demonstrated a remarkably high correlation with the clinician-administered Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Adolescents (LSAS-CA), yielding coefficients consistently exceeding r = .80 across evaluation timepoints. Furthermore, it demonstrated strong convergence with youth-completed self-report measures measuring identical underlying constructs, notably the Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory (SPAI; r > .70). Moderate to strong correlations were observed with global clinical metrics, including the Clinical Global Impressions Severity scale (CGI-S) and Improvement scale (CGI-I), demonstrating that clinicians’ overall clinical impressions map directly onto K-GSADS-A score fluctuations.

Discriminant (Divergent) Validity

To demonstrate that the scale measures social anxiety specifically rather than undifferentiated psychological distress or general negative affectivity, correlations were computed against validated depression inventories (e.g., the Children’s Depression Rating Scale-Revised [CDRS-R] and the Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]). The K-GSADS-A correlated only weakly with these depressive indices (typically r < .35), confirming robust divergent validity and proving that the scale captures the unique clinical phenomenology of social phobia without substantial confounding by comorbid depressive symptoms.

Evaluative Validity and Sensitivity to Change

A cardinal metric for any evaluative rating scale is its responsiveness to therapeutic recovery. Throughout the 16-week clinical pharmacology trial, reductions in K-GSADS-A total and subscale scores closely paralleled clinical improvement documented across five assessment visits. Effect size calculations demonstrated large treatment-effect differentiation between active pharmacological compounds and placebo, confirming that the K-GSADS-A possess outstanding sensitivity to change over repeated assessments.

Reliability

The reliability parameters of the K-GSADS-A have been evaluated across multiple independent clinical and non-clinical youth samples, demonstrating strong internal consistency alongside predictable test-retest characteristics in evaluative contexts.

Internal Consistency

In the primary empirical psychometric trial reported by Brooks and Kutcher (2004), internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach’s alpha (α) across all five assessment timepoints throughout the 16-week period. The alpha coefficients for the total composite scale and its individual subscales ranged between .74 and .96. At baseline and intermediate treatment weeks, the Total Score Cronbach’s alpha consistently exceeded .90, demonstrating excellent internal homogeneity across items while retaining sufficient multidimensional breadth across behavioral, cognitive, and somatic domains.

Test-Retest Reliability and Stability

In evaluative drug trial designs, assessing test-retest reliability is inherently complicated by intervention effects. To overcome this, Brooks and Kutcher evaluated stability metrics exclusively within the placebo-treated adolescent subgroup across a stable 4-week baseline-to-endpoint monitoring window. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was .64. In psychometric terms, an ICC of .64 across an extended 4-week window in a dynamic psychiatric disorder reflects moderate, acceptable reproducibility, demonstrating that while natural symptom waxing and waning occurs in the absence of active medication, baseline score variance remains systematically anchored.

Factor Analysis

Structural evaluations of the K-GSADS-A align with its conceptual theoretical framework, reflecting a higher-order overarching social anxiety construct supported by four interconnected lower-order factors. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic studies on adolescent social anxiety rating instruments consistently demonstrate that social anxiety models in youth must segregate cognitive apprehension from overt behavioral avoidance, while separately delineating affective-somatic reactivity.

The structural composition of the K-GSADS-A conforms to this four-dimensional model:

  • Factor 1: Interactional and Performance Fear/Anxiety – Comprising Section A anxiety ratings across social and performance situations (items 1–18, column 1), accounting for substantial primary variance.
  • Factor 2: Behavioral Social Avoidance – Comprising Section A avoidance ratings across identical situations (items 1–18, column 2), loading on an independent behavioral evasion dimension.
  • Factor 3: Affective Distress – Comprising Section C items 1–5, capturing generalized emotional distress, anticipatory dread, and demoralization.
  • Factor 4: Autonomic Somatic Reactivity – Comprising Section C items 6–11, capturing peripheral visceral symptoms including flushing, tremor, diaphoresis, and gastrointestinal distress.

Confirmatory factor analyses in cross-cultural adolescent investigations (e.g., Inam et al., 2014) corroborate this multidimensional integrity, yielding goodness-of-fit indices (Comparative Fit Index [CFI] > .90, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA] ≤ .06) that endorse the preservation of distinct subscale totals alongside an aggregated composite severity index.

Instrument / Measurement Tool

  • Instrument Name: Kutcher Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder Scale for Adolescents (K-GSADS-A)
  • Format: Clinician-administered semi-structured evaluative rating scale (integrates youth interview, clinical behavioral observation, and parent/guardian collateral reports)
  • Target Population: Children and adolescents aged 11 to 17 years
  • Administration Time: Approximately 20 to 35 minutes
  • Structural Composition:
    • Section A: Standardized Social Scenarios (18 Items) – Evaluates 18 common social interaction and performance contexts. Each item is dual-rated across two parallel columns: (1) Fear/Discomfort/Anxiety and (2) Behavioral Avoidance.
    • Section B: Idiographic Feared Scenarios (3 Items) – The clinician records the adolescent’s three most personally feared or idiosyncratic social situations, each rated on the same fear and avoidance dimensions.
    • Section C: Affective and Somatic Distress (11 Items) – Evaluates generalized emotional distress (Items C1–C5) and physiological/somatic hyperarousal symptoms (Items C6–C11).
  • Response Scale: 4-point Likert-type severity metric across all sections:
    • 0 = Never / None
    • 1 = Mild (infrequent distress or occasional avoidance; minimal disruption)
    • 2 = Moderate (frequent distress or regular avoidance; noticeable functional impairment)
    • 3 = Severe (pervasive distress or near-total avoidance; incapacitating impairment)
  • Scoring and Subscales:
    • Fear and Anxiety Score: Sum of Section A items 1–18 (Anxiety column; range: 0–54)
    • Avoidance Score: Sum of Section A items 1–18 (Avoidance column; range: 0–54)
    • Affective Distress Score: Sum of Section C items 1–5 (range: 0–15)
    • Somatic Distress Score: Sum of Section C items 6–11 (range: 0–18)
    • Total K-GSADS-A Composite Score: Sum of the four primary subscale scores (Total possible range: 0–141, excluding Section B idiographic tracking)
  • Score Interpretation: The K-GSADS-A is not intended as a categorical cut-off diagnostic screener; rather, it is interpreted evaluatively against the patient’s baseline pre-treatment score. Upward trajectory indicates symptom exacerbation, whereas downward trajectories objectively quantify clinical response or treatment-induced remission.

Permissions & Fee and Test Year

The Kutcher Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder Scale for Adolescents was formulated in 1999 and formally published in peer-reviewed literature in 2004 by Dr. Stanley Kutcher and S. J. Brooks. In keeping with Dr. Kutcher’s commitment to global mental health literacy and clinical accessibility, the scale is an open-access, royalty-free instrument. It is made available without licensing fees for academic research, clinical education, and non-commercial therapeutic use.

Clinicians and investigators can download the complete clinical rating manual and printable assessment forms directly from Dr. Stanley Kutcher’s adolescent mental health clinical toolbox repository at TeenMentalHealth.org. Commercial redistribution, inclusion in proprietary digital health applications, or unauthorized modification of items requires formal written permission from the copyright holders.

References

  • Brooks, S. J., & Kutcher, S. (2004). The Kutcher Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder Scale for Adolescents: Assessment of its evaluative properties over the course of a 16-week pediatric psychopharmacotherapy trial. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 14(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1089/1044546041649002
  • Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). The Guilford Press.
  • Inam, A., Khalil, H., Tahir, W. B., & Abiodullah, M. (2014). Relationship of emotional intelligence with social anxiety and social competence of adolescents. Nurture, 8(1), 20–29.
  • Liebowitz, M. R. (1987). Social phobia. Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 141–173. https://doi.org/10.1159/000414022
  • Masia-Warner, C., Storch, E. A., Pincus, D. B., Klein, R. G., Heimberg, R. G., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2003). The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale for Children and Adolescents (LSAS-CA): Evaluating its psychometric properties. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(8), 920–928. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CHI.0000056093.59325.F7
  • Rapee, R. M., & Heimberg, R. G. (1997). A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(8), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00022-3
  • Turner, S. M., Beidel, D. C., Dancu, C. V., & Stanley, M. A. (1989). An empirically derived inventory to measure social fears and anxiety: The Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.1.1.35

Items of the Scale

Disclaimer: The K-GSADS-A is a clinician-rated scale developed for specialized clinical trials and evaluative psychiatric monitoring. The complete clinical booklet, interview prompts, and scoring forms are protected under academic copyright and available through professional clinical mental health repositories. Below is an authoritative presentation of the instrument’s structural inventory, operational subscales, and standardized scoring protocol in conformity with the published clinical architecture.

Rating Instructions and Response Scale

The clinician rates the adolescent based on direct clinical interview, behavioral observations, and collateral information obtained from caregivers. The K-GSAD-A has three sections. In section A there are 18 items relating to fear and avoidance (of social situations). Each item is rated on two scales, the first being discomfort/anxiety/distress experienced, and the second being avoidance. Items are rated using a four-point scale of strength of fear/avoidance, ranging from 0= ‘never’, 1= ‘mild’, 2= ‘moderate’, and 3= ‘severe’. In section B, the respondent is asked for three of their most feared social situations which are also rated on the above four-point scales. Section C consists of 11 items relating to affective and somatic distress measured on the same scale.

Standardized 4-Point Rating Metric:

  • 0 = Never (None / Absent)
  • 1 = Mild (Occasional or minor fear/anxiety; rare or minimal avoidance; negligible functional interference)
  • 2 = Moderate (Noticeable fear/anxiety; frequent or clear avoidance; distinct functional interference)
  • 3 = Severe (Intense or paralyzing fear/anxiety; pervasive or near-total avoidance; profound functional interference)

Section A: Social Scenarios (Items 1 to 18)

Each of the 18 standardized social scenarios is rated concurrently across two independent dimensions: (1) Fear / Discomfort / Anxiety (0–3) and (2) Behavioral Avoidance (0–3).

  1. Participating or speaking up in a classroom discussion or academic group
  2. Presenting an oral report, speech, or reading aloud before classmates
  3. Approaching and initiating a conversation with an unfamiliar peer
  4. Joining an ongoing group of peers at school or in a social setting
  5. Interacting with peers of romantic or interpersonal interest
  6. Eating, drinking, or carrying food in front of peers (e.g., in the school cafeteria)
  7. Writing, drawing, or working while someone stands by and watches
  8. Engaging in physical education, sports, or athletic games in front of others
  9. Attending school parties, dances, social gatherings, or extracurricular events
  10. Speaking with an authority figure (e.g., teacher, school principal, counselor)
  11. Entering a classroom or social space where everyone else is already seated
  12. Using public or communal school restrooms
  13. Expressing personal opinions, disagreements, or differing viewpoints to peers
  14. Answering questions when called upon unexpectedly by an educator
  15. Making telephone or video calls to peers or unfamiliar acquaintances
  16. Walking through busy school hallways or congregating in open social areas
  17. Returning merchandise, asking store clerks for help, or ordering food at a counter
  18. Being invited to participate in spontaneous social outings or gatherings with peers

Section B: Idiographic Feared Situations (Items 19 to 21)

The clinician solicits the adolescent’s three most personally feared or avoided idiosyncratic social scenarios. Each situation is recorded verbatim and scored on both the Fear/Anxiety (0–3) and Avoidance (0–3) metrics.

  1. Most feared personalized social situation #1 (Clinician recorded: _________________)
    Rating: Fear/Anxiety: [0, 1, 2, 3]  |  Avoidance: [0, 1, 2, 3]
  2. Most feared personalized social situation #2 (Clinician recorded: _________________)
    Rating: Fear/Anxiety: [0, 1, 2, 3]  |  Avoidance: [0, 1, 2, 3]
  3. Most feared personalized social situation #3 (Clinician recorded: _________________)
    Rating: Fear/Anxiety: [0, 1, 2, 3]  |  Avoidance: [0, 1, 2, 3]

Section C: Affective and Somatic Distress (Items 22 to 32)

Rated on the same 4-point severity metric (0 = Never, 1 = Mild, 2 = Moderate, 3 = Severe).

Affective Distress Domain (Items C 1–5 / Items 22–26):

  1. Anticipatory dread and worry experienced hours or days before entering a social event
  2. Feelings of intense nervousness, panic, or emotional distress during social interactions
  3. Post-event rumination and self-critical analysis following social performance situations
  4. Feelings of demoralization, despair, or sadness secondary to social isolation or anxiety
  5. Distressing feelings of self-consciousness or perceiving oneself as clumsy, awkward, or inferior

Somatic Distress Domain (Items C 6–11 / Items 27–32):

  1. Blushing, flushing, or sensation of facial heat during social exposure
  2. Trembling, shaking of hands, or body tremors when observed or speaking
  3. Palpitations, racing heart, or pounding cardiac sensations in social settings
  4. Sweating, clamminess, or diaphoresis (hands, face, or underarms)
  5. Gastrointestinal distress, nausea, “butterflies,” or abdominal discomfort
  6. Dry mouth, muscle stiffness, shortness of breath, or voice trembling
Subscale Calculation Summary:

  • Fear and Anxiety Score: Sum of Items A 1–18 (Anxiety column, 0–54)
  • Avoidance Score: Sum of Items A 1–18 (Avoidance column, 0–54)
  • Affective Distress Score: Sum of Items C 1–5 (0–15)
  • Somatic Distress Score: Sum of Items C 6–11 (0–18)
  • Total K-GSADS-A Score: Fear Score + Avoidance Score + Affective Score + Somatic Score (0–141)

Rate This Scale

5.0 / 5 1 vote

Cite This Article

memjavad (2026, September 16). Kutcher Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder Scale for Adolescents (K-GSADS-A). PSYCHOLOGICAL DATABASE. https://en.arabpsychology.com/scales/kutcher-generalized-social-anxiety-disorder-scale-for-adolescents-k-gsads-a/
memjavad. “Kutcher Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder Scale for Adolescents (K-GSADS-A).” PSYCHOLOGICAL DATABASE, 16 September 2026, https://en.arabpsychology.com/scales/kutcher-generalized-social-anxiety-disorder-scale-for-adolescents-k-gsads-a/.
memjavad. “Kutcher Generalized Social Anxiety Disorder Scale for Adolescents (K-GSADS-A).” PSYCHOLOGICAL DATABASE. September 16, 2026. https://en.arabpsychology.com/scales/kutcher-generalized-social-anxiety-disorder-scale-for-adolescents-k-gsads-a/.