Perceived Medical School Stress Scale – Chinese version

1. Abstract

Medical education is globally recognized as one of the most demanding, academically rigorous, and emotionally grueling courses of professional training. While generalized psychological assessment batteries capture broad affective distress, they frequently fail to detect the unique, context-dependent pedagogical, social, and clinical stressors inherent to healthcare education. To address this persistent psychometric gap within Asian training environments, researchers adapted and validated the Perceived Medical School Stress Scale – Chinese version (PMSS-C). Originally formulated by Prof. Peter P. Vitaliano, the instrument underwent systematic cross-cultural adaptation using Brislin's forward-backward translation framework to reflect the educational landscape of tertiary medical institutions in China. The resulting 13-item self-report questionnaire operates across a multidimensional two-factor architecture that captures core dimensions of academic overload, professional vulnerability, and clinical socialization demands.

Psychometric evaluation in a heterogeneous sample of 891 Chinese medical and healthcare students (mean age = 20.2 years, SD = 2.1) revealed outstanding measurement properties. Internal consistency reliability reached exceptional thresholds, demonstrated by an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.911, subscale alphas of 0.899 and 0.851, and a McDonald's omega (ω) of 0.914. Longitudinal test-retest reliability across a three-week interval yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.794, demonstrating temporal stability without transient state contamination. Construct and criterion validity were substantiated through significant, theoretically coherent correlations: PMSS scores exhibited a robust positive association with insomnia severity as assessed by the Insomnia Severity Index (r = 0.504, p < 0.001) and an inverse relationship with the General Self-Efficacy Scale (r = -0.108, p < 0.01). Furthermore, empirical cut-off scores established at 23 and 32 distinguish between low, moderate, and high-stress student strata. The Chinese PMSS offers educators, researchers, and campus mental health clinicians an empirically validated, brief, and highly diagnostic instrument for longitudinal wellness surveillance, institutional benchmarking, and early psychotherapeutic intervention.

2. Keywords

Perceived Medical School Stress, PMSS Chinese version, medical student distress, psychometric validation, cross-cultural adaptation, academic stress, medical education, transactional stress theory, mental health screening, burnout prevention, factor structure, clinical clerkship

3. Authors

The cross-cultural adaptation, psychometric validation, and empirical standardization of the Perceived Medical School Stress Scale – Chinese version were conducted by a specialized research collaborative focused on medical education and psychological well-being in mainland China:

• Chunyan Zhang — Department of Medical Education and Psychology Research Collaborative, China. Principal investigator overseeing instrument adaptation, psychometric design, and data governance.
• Chunguang Liang — Corresponding Author. Academic researcher and clinical educator. Email: [email protected]. Directed the multi-site data collection, statistical modeling, and institutional liaison.
• Fan Zhang — Co-investigator. Contributed to semantic equivalence evaluations, forward-backward translation protocols, and psychometric analytics.
• Qian Zhang — Co-investigator. Managed participant recruitment, survey administration across regional universities, and data curation.
• Kaiyan Xu — Co-investigator. Assisted with structural equation modeling, construct validity verifications, and clinical threshold derivation.

The adaptation was conducted under formal authorization and with academic permission from the original instrument architect, Prof. Peter P. Vitaliano (Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA).

4. Purpose

The fundamental purpose of the Perceived Medical School Stress Scale – Chinese version is to provide a standardized, psychometrically sound, and culturally nuanced diagnostic measurement tool specifically tailored to identify, quantify, and track the subjective perception of stress generated by undergraduate and graduate medical curricula. Medical training has long been documented as an environmental incubator for heightened psychological morbidity. Decades of epidemiological studies indicate that medical trainees experience significantly higher rates of clinical depression, generalized anxiety, emotional exhaustion, substance misuse, and suicidal ideation compared to age-matched peers pursuing non-medical academic tracks or the general populace (Dyrbye et al., 2006; Puthran et al., 2016).

Historically, educators and collegiate psychological services within Chinese tertiary institutions relied on generalized psychological screening batteries, such as the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10/PSS-14), or the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Although these omnibus measures are effective for screening non-specific emotional distress, they possess marked conceptual limitations when applied within medical pedagogical contexts. Broad-spectrum tools are unable to distinguish between normative ambient life stress (e.g., financial strain, generic interpersonal friction, existential developmental transitions) and the idiosyncratic, systemic stressors embedded within medical training. These specialized stressors encompass massive rote memorization requirements, hyper-competitive class rankings, relentless examination schedules, frequent formative assessments, exposure to patient mortality and morbidity during early bedside rotations, fear of committing fatal clinical errors, hierarchical supervisory relationships, and the abrupt disruption of personal work-life boundaries.

Without an instrument that directly indexes these environmental and professional stressors, educational policymakers and academic deans lack the granular data necessary to design targeted, evidence-based curricular and systemic modifications. By isolating perceived stress directly attributed to the medical school experience, the PMSS-C serves dual objectives across research and applied domains:

• Institutional Surveillance and Programmatic Evaluation: It facilitates longitudinal tracking of cohort-level stress trajectories across preclinical lecture phases, laboratory transitions, and clinical clerkship rotations, enabling faculty to evaluate the psychological impact of curricular reforms (such as pass/fail grading systems, integrated organ-system curricula, or protected wellness periods).
• Preventive Clinical Triage: It provides university counseling centers and student affairs offices with standardized cut-off parameters to identify high-risk trainees who are on the precipice of clinical burnout, cynical detachment, loss of clinical empathy, or academic attrition, thereby allowing timely psychoeducational and psychiatric intervention prior to crisis presentation.
• Cross-Cultural Comparative Research: Given the substantial differences in training length, degree structures (e.g., 5-year bachelor's plus master's tracks versus North American 4-year post-baccalaureate MD pathways), and cultural dynamics surrounding filial piety, social expectations, and clinical hierarchy in East Asia, the PMSS-C provides an essential benchmark for comparative international medical education research.

5. Psychological Construct

The psychological construct evaluated by the Perceived Medical School Stress Scale – Chinese version is the subjective cognitive appraisal of demands, pressures, and role constraints experienced specifically within the medical education milieu. Perceived medical school stress does not represent an objective tally of credit hours, clinical shift lengths, or pages of assigned reading; rather, it reflects the trainee's individualized appraisal that these academic, personal, and professional requirements strain or overwhelm their internal and external coping capacities.

Psychometric investigation of the 13-item Chinese PMSS confirms a robust multidimensional architecture organized into two correlated primary dimensions that collectively span the psychological landscape of modern healthcare training:

Dimension 1: Academic Overload and Curricular Pressure

This primary subscale encapsulates the pervasive sense of cognitive strain, cognitive saturation, and competitive anxiety triggered by the sheer volume and pace of medical training. Core facets assessed under this dimension include:

• Cognitive Saturation: The subjective experience of being intellectually overwhelmed by vast, complex curricula spanning biochemistry, gross anatomy, pathology, pharmacology, and clinical diagnostics. Students experience constant fear that their mnemonic and analytical capacities are insufficient to retain the requisite volume of clinical knowledge.
• Evaluative Anxiety and Fear of Failure: Trainees in Chinese medical schools frequently encounter hyper-competitive class cohorts where individual class rank directly dictates competitive postgraduate residency placement, hospital tier allocation, and future career stability. This fosters chronic evaluative dread surrounding modular examinations, clinical skills assessments (OSCEs), and supervisory questioning.
• Chronobiological Deprivation and Time Poverty: The chronic subjective deprivation of restorative personal time, characterized by feelings that academic demands leave virtually no opportunity for physiological recovery, physical exercise, leisure pursuits, or regular circadian sleep patterns.

Dimension 2: Professional Socialization and Role Strain

The second subscale captures the socio-emotional, ethical, and interpersonal friction experienced as trainees transition from traditional didactic pupils to emerging clinical practitioners. Key facets within this construct include:

• Clinical Inadequacy and Impostor Phenomena: The persistent internal distress stemming from self-perceived incompetence when entering hospital wards, confronting actual clinical procedures, or assuming responsibility for patient welfare. Trainees experience acute apprehension regarding making erroneous clinical decisions or appearing inept before attending physicians and clinical preceptors.
• Hierarchical and Interpersonal Vulnerability: Medical training environments maintain strict, traditional social hierarchies. Trainees often navigate complex relational dynamics with clinical supervisors, ward managers, senior residents, and multidisciplinary healthcare teams, where expressing emotional fatigue, uncertainty, or vulnerability may be stigmatized as professional weakness.
• Existential Exposure and Moral Distress: The cognitive and emotional burden of premature exposure to suffering, chronic illness, end-of-life crises, and fraught patient-family interactions, which may trigger emotional exhaustion, cynical coping, and disillusionment regarding the realities of the healthcare system.

Together, these two dimensions operationalize medical school stress as a unified, ecologically valid construct that spans both the desk-bound cognitive burdens of didactic scholarship and the emotionally charged realities of hospital apprenticeship.

6. Theoretical Framework

The structural and operational architecture of the Perceived Medical School Stress Scale is fundamentally anchored in Richard Lazarus and Susan Folkman's seminal Transactional Model of Stress and Coping (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). Under this theoretical orientation, stress is conceptualized neither as an external environmental stimulus (e.g., an upcoming pharmacology exam) nor as an isolated physiological response (e.g., elevated cortisol or tachycardia), but rather as an ongoing, bidirectional transaction between the individual and their specific environment.

Cognitive Appraisal Processes in Medical Education

The Transactional Model posits that the emergence of psychological distress hinges upon two sequential yet intertwined stages of cognitive appraisal:

1. Primary Appraisal: The trainee evaluates an environmental event or condition within the medical school environment to determine its personal significance. In this stage, the student implicitly assesses: "Is this academic or clinical expectation benign, irrelevant, or a threat to my well-being, status, and professional identity?" In the context of medical school, continuous examinations and supervisory questioning are frequently appraised as persistent threats of academic humiliation, institutional dismissal, or professional failure.
2. Secondary Appraisal: Simultaneously, the trainee evaluates their personal, social, and psychological coping repertoires: "Do I possess the cognitive stamina, emotional resilience, academic skills, and social support necessary to master these demands?" When the student concludes that environmental demands vastly outweigh their available resources, the cognitive state of perceived medical school stress crystallizes.

The PMSS does not measure the external hours logged in lecture halls or wards; instead, its items directly quantify the output of this secondary appraisal process—the extent to which the trainee perceives that the training environment is depleting their psychological resources.

Socio-Cultural Contextualization: The Chinese Educational Ecology

The theoretical framework of the Chinese version is further enriched by sociological models of academic achievement and institutional dynamics within East Asian societies. Medical education in China is characterized by distinct socio-cultural imperatives that amplify the transactional appraisal of stress:

• Confucian Educational Values and Familial Obligation: Academic achievement in the Chinese cultural sphere is viewed not merely as an individual milestone but as a reflection of familial honor, parental investment, and societal contribution. Medical students frequently carry profound psychological obligations to fulfill family expectations, transforming academic underperformance into an intense existential and familial failure.
• Structural Competition in Tertiary Healthcare: The structure of the Chinese healthcare landscape concentrates elite clinical training and career advancement within Tier-3 (tertiary grade A) university-affiliated hospitals. Securing positions within these institutions requires outstanding academic standings, high-tier research publications, and relentless clinical dedication. The intense scarcity of top-tier hospital appointments intensifies peer competition and elevates the perceived stakes of every curricular assessment.
• Physician-Patient Relational Complexities: Modern Chinese healthcare settings present heightened operational tensions, including severe outpatient overcrowding, rapid patient turnaround, and historical challenges in patient-provider communication. Medical students are acutely aware of these systemic pressures early in their clerkships, which informs their appraisal of future occupational vulnerability and elevates perceived stress during clinical rotations.

7. Validity

The psychometric validation of the Perceived Medical School Stress Scale – Chinese version was conducted through comprehensive empirical testing across construct, convergent, discriminant, and criterion-related validity paradigms, adhering to the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.

Construct and Structural Validity

To establish structural construct validity, the translation underwent rigorous content validation using Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI) framework. An expert panel consisting of clinical psychologists, senior medical educators, and psychometricians evaluated each translated item for linguistic clarity, cultural relevance, and theoretical congruence with Vitaliano's original construct. The scale demonstrated excellent item-level (I-CVI > 0.85) and scale-level content validity (S-CVI/Ave > 0.90), confirming that the items accurately reflect the medical school stress domain without semantic ambiguity.

Convergent Validity

Convergent validity was evaluated by assessing bivariate correlations between the PMSS-C total score and theoretically allied psychological instruments administered concurrently within the validation cohort (N = 891):

• Insomnia Severity Index (ISI): Sleep disturbances are recognized neurobiological and behavioral correlates of sustained cognitive-emotional strain. Bivariate analysis revealed a robust, statistically significant positive correlation between the PMSS-C and the Insomnia Severity Index (r = 0.504, p < 0.001). This confirms that higher levels of perceived medical school stress are directly coupled with clinically significant insomnia, fragmented sleep architecture, and daytime somnolence among medical trainees (Gardani et al., 2022; Almojali et al., 2017).
• General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES): According to Bandura's social cognitive theory and Lazarus's appraisal model, elevated perceived stress correlates with attenuated beliefs in personal mastery and agency. The PMSS-C exhibited a statistically significant negative correlation with the Chinese version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (r = -0.108, p < 0.01). While modest, this inverse association verifies that students who perceive excessive curriculum strain experience diminished confidence in their global ability to execute required actions and overcome developmental hurdles.

Discriminant and Known-Groups Validity

Discriminant validity was established through extreme-groups analysis. The total distribution was stratified into top and bottom 27% quartiles. Independent samples t-tests demonstrated highly significant differences (p < 0.001) across all 13 individual item scores and subscale sums between the high-stress and low-stress subgroups. Furthermore, the tool differentiated between students experiencing preclinical versus clinical phases, with trainees entering hospital rotations reporting significantly heightened role strain and somatic sleep disruptions.

8. Reliability

The Perceived Medical School Stress Scale – Chinese version demonstrates exceptional reliability metrics across multiple psychometric paradigms, confirming high internal consistency and temporal measurement stability.

Internal Consistency Reliability

Internal consistency was analyzed using classical test theory indices and modern structural equation approaches:

• Cronbach's Alpha (α): The full 13-item PMSS-C demonstrated an outstanding Cronbach's alpha of 0.911, well in excess of the recommended 0.80 benchmark for psychometric research and comfortably above the 0.90 standard required for clinical triage. Analysis of the subscales similarly showed high internal consistency: Subscale 1 (Academic Overload) yielded α = 0.899, and Subscale 2 (Professional Socialization) yielded α = 0.851.
• McDonald's Omega (ω): Because Cronbach's alpha assumes tau-equivalence (equal factor loadings across all items) and can misestimate reliability when assumptions are violated, researchers computed McDonald's omega total. The scale achieved an omega coefficient of 0.914, confirming high internal consistency under congeneric measurement conditions.
• Item-Total Correlations: Corrected item-total correlations for all 13 items ranged from 0.618 to 0.746, well above the conventional 0.30 retention threshold. Furthermore, stepwise "alpha-if-item-deleted" simulations revealed that removing any single item produced alpha values ranging from 0.902 to 0.909, demonstrating that every item contributes meaningfully to the overall scale without redundancy.

Temporal Stability (Test-Retest Reliability)

To confirm that the instrument measures stable cognitive appraisals rather than acute, transient affective shifts (e.g., immediate pre-examination panic), a subsample completed a repeated administration after a three-week interval. The test-retest reliability coefficient was r = 0.794 (p < 0.001), indicating strong temporal stability across time while remaining appropriately sensitive to enduring environmental stress conditions.

9. Factor Analysis

The internal dimensionality and structural integrity of the 13-item PMSS-C were examined through an empirical factor-analytic pipeline combining Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) across split-half calibration and validation subsamples.

Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)

Prior to extraction, sampling adequacy and data factorability were verified. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure reached an outstanding 0.932, exceeding the recommended 0.80 threshold. Bartlett's Test of Sphericity yielded a highly significant result (χ² = 6428.31, df = 78, p < 0.001), confirming that the inter-item correlation matrix was well-suited for factor extraction.

Principal Axis Factoring with oblique rotation (Promax) was performed, accounting for expected correlations between stress dimensions. Examination of the eigenvalue scree plot alongside Horn's Parallel Analysis supported a two-factor solution with eigenvalues exceeding unity (λ > 1.0). The two retained latent factors accounted for more than 60% of the cumulative variance. Factor loadings were robust, with primary loadings for all 13 items exceeding 0.55 and demonstrating negligible cross-loadings (< 0.25):

• Factor 1 (Academic Overload): Encompasses items measuring the cognitive volume of coursework, pace of instruction, competitive assessment demands, and time scarcity.
• Factor 2 (Professional Socialization & Role Strain): Encompasses items tapping clinical inadequacy, fear of clinical error, interpersonal hierarchies, and identity dissonance.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

A second independent validation sample was subjected to Confirmatory Factor Analysis using Maximum Likelihood estimation to test the goodness-of-fit of the hypothesized two-factor oblique model. The empirical model demonstrated an acceptable-to-good fit to the observed data, meeting standard criteria (χ²/df < 3.0, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA] ≤ 0.065, Comparative Fit Index [CFI] ≥ 0.94, Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] ≥ 0.93, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual [SRMR] ≤ 0.048). Standardized factor loadings across all 13 items ranged from 0.63 to 0.83 (all p < 0.001), affirming that each item serves as a strong, reliable indicator of its designated latent factor.

10. Instrument / Measurement Tool

The structural characteristics, administration parameters, and scoring protocols for the Perceived Medical School Stress Scale – Chinese version are outlined below:

• Instrument Name: Perceived Medical School Stress Scale – Chinese version (PMSS-C)
• Original Instrument Developer: Prof. Peter P. Vitaliano (1989)
• Chinese Adaptation Authors: Chunyan Zhang, Chunguang Liang, Fan Zhang, Qian Zhang, Kaiyan Xu (2025)
• Test Type: Standardized self-report psychometric questionnaire
• Administration Format: Paper-and-pencil questionnaire or secure digital/online survey portal (optimized for mobile and web deployment)
• Target Population: Undergraduate medical students, clinical interns, degree upgraders, and postgraduate medical trainees across healthcare specialties (e.g., Clinical Medicine, Nursing, Preventive Medicine, Stomatology)
• Item Count: 13 items
• Response Format: Likert-type scale
• Estimated Completion Time: 3 to 5 minutes
• Scoring Procedure: Individual item scores are summed linearly to yield a composite global stress index. Subscale scores for Academic Overload and Professional Socialization may also be calculated by summing their respective constituent items.
• Normative Reference Values: In the primary validation cohort (N = 891), the normative sample mean was 27.22 with a standard deviation of 8.80.
• Clinical and Screening Cut-Off Scores:
  • Total Score < 23: Low Perceived Stress (indicates adaptive coping, manageable academic friction, or effective psychological equilibrium).
  • Total Score 23 to 31: Moderate Perceived Stress (reflects typical curricular strain; benefits from wellness resources, stress management workshops, and regular faculty mentoring).
  • Total Score ≥ 32: High Perceived Stress (indicates severe psychological strain, cognitive saturation, and high vulnerability to burnout, clinical anxiety, or depressive decompensation; warrants proactive institutional support and clinical triage).

11. Permissions & Fee and Test Year

The cross-cultural validation of the Chinese version was published in 2025 following formal academic authorization and translation permissions obtained from the original scale developer, Prof. Peter P. Vitaliano. The psychometric validation study appeared in BMC Psychology.

The Perceived Medical School Stress Scale – Chinese version is intended for non-commercial academic research, institutional evaluation, and collegiate wellness assessment. However, because the scale is derived from copyrighted intellectual property, the full standardized items are not placed within the public domain without restriction. Researchers and clinical institutions wishing to administer the official 13-item Chinese instrument must obtain academic clearance and scale materials by contacting the corresponding author:

• Contact Person: Chunguang Liang
• Email Address: [email protected]
• Licensing Requirements: Academic and non-commercial educational use is typically granted without fee upon submission of an academic request describing the study design, institutional affiliation, and ethical review board (IRB) approval. Commercial deployment, commercial mobile applications, or corporate licensing require explicit written authorization and contractual licensing agreements.

12. References

Below is the scholarly bibliography supporting the theoretical, cross-cultural, and psychometric foundation of the Perceived Medical School Stress Scale:

• Abdulghani, H. M., Alkanhal, A. A., Mahmoud, E. S., Ponnamperuma, G. G., & Alfaris, E. A. (2011). Stress and its effects on medical students: A cross-sectional study at a college of medicine in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 29(5), 516–522. https://doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v29i5.8906
• Almojali, A. I., Almalki, S. A., Alothman, A. S., Masuadi, E. M., & Alaqeel, M. K. (2017). The prevalence and association of stress with sleep quality among medical students. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 7(3), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2017.04.005
• Antila, H., Kwak, I., Choi, A., Pisupati, A., Liu, K., & Weber, F. (2022). A noradrenergic-hypothalamic neural substrate for stress-induced sleep disturbances. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(45), Article e2123528119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2123528119
• Backović, D. V., Zivojinović, J. I., Maksimović, J., & Maksimović, M. (2012). Gender differences in academic stress and burnout among medical students in final years of education. Psychiatria Danubina, 24(2), 175–181.
• Baldassin, S., Alves, T. C., de Andrade, A. G., & Nogueira Martins, L. A. (2008). The characteristics of depressive symptoms in medical students during medical education and training: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 8, Article 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-8-60
• Bartlett, J., & Fowler, K. (2020). Beyond the curriculum: A cross-sectional study of medical student psychological distress, and health care needs, practices and barriers. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 55(9), 1215–1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01771-1
• Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various χ² approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 16(2), 296–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00174.x
• Bassols, A. M., Okabayashi, L. S., Silva, A. B., Carneiro, B. B., Feijó, F., Guimarães, G. C., Cortes, G. T., Rohde, L. A., & Eizirik, C. L. (2014). First- and last-year medical students: Is there a difference in the prevalence and intensity of anxiety and depressive symptoms? Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 36(3), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2013-1183
• Bastien, C. H., Vallières, A., & Morin, C. M. (2001). Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Medicine, 2(4), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9457(00)00065-4
• Bramness, J. G., Fixdal, T. C., & Vaglum, P. (1991). Effect of medical school stress on the mental health of medical students in early and late clinical curriculum. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 84(4), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03157.x
• Cheung, S. K., & Sun, S. Y. (1999). Assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Further validation of the Chinese version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychological Reports, 85(3 Pt 2), 1221–1224. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1999.85.3f.1221
• Chung, K. F., Kan, K. K., & Yeung, W. F. (2011). Assessing insomnia in adolescents: Comparison of Insomnia Severity Index, Athens Insomnia Scale and Sleep Quality Index. Sleep Medicine, 12(5), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2010.09.019
• Çınar Tanrıverdi, E., Yılmaz, S., & Çayır, Y. (2023). Evaluation the validity and reliability of the perceived medical school stress scale in Turkish medical students. PLOS ONE, 18(8), Article e0288769. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288769
• Cui, M. (2021). COVID-19 and mental health of young adult children in China: Economic impact, family dynamics, and resilience. Family Relations, 70(5), 1358–1368. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12573
• Dahlin, M., & Joneborg, N. (2005). Stress and depression among medical students: A cross-sectional study. Medical Education, 39(6), 594–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02176.x
• Dunn, L. B., Moutier, C., Green Hammond, K. A., & Roberts, L. W. (2008). Personal health care of residents: Preferences for care outside of the training institution. Academic Psychiatry, 32(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.32.1.20
• Dyrbye, L. N., Harper, W., Durning, S. J., Moutier, C., Thomas, M. R., Massie, F. S., Jr., Eacker, A., Szydlo, D. W., Sloan, J. A., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2011). Patterns of distress in US medical students. Medical Teacher, 33(10), 834–839. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.531158
• Dyrbye, L. N., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2011). Medical student distress: A call to action. Academic Medicine, 86(7), 801–803. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31821da481
• Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2005). Medical student distress: Causes, consequences, and proposed solutions. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 80(12), 1613–1622. https://doi.org/10.4065/80.12.1613
• Dyrbye, L. N., Thomas, M. R., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2006). Systematic review of depression, anxiety, and other indicators of psychological distress among U.S. and Canadian medical students. Academic Medicine, 81(4), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200604000-00009
• Fawzy, M., & Hamed, S. A. (2017). Prevalence of psychological stress, depression and anxiety among medical students in Egypt. Psychiatry Research, 255, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.027
• Gardani, M., Bradford, D. R. R., Russell, K., Allan, S., Beattie, L., Ellis, J. G., & Barclay, N. L. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of poor sleep, insomnia symptoms and stress in undergraduate students. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 61, Article 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101565
• Heinen, I., Bullinger, M., & Kocalevent, R. D. (2017). Perceived stress in first year medical students – associations with personal resources and emotional distress. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0841-8
• Hunt, J. (2010). Mental health problems and help-seeking behavior among college students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.08.008
• Ibrahim, N., Al-Kharboush, D., El-Khatib, L., Al-Abaasi, A., & Al-Ghamdi, H. (2013). Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression among female medical students in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 42(7), 726–736.
• Inam, S. N. B., Saqib, A., & Alam, E. (2003). Prevalence of anxiety and depression among medical students of private university. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 53(2), 44–47.
• Iqbal, S., & Gupta, S. (2015). Stress, anxiety and depression among medical undergraduate students and their socio-demographic correlates. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 141(3), 354–357. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.156571
• Jia, G., Dai, H., Chu, Y., & Yang, Z. (2022). Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of Social Anxiety Scale for Social Media Users and cross-sectional investigation into this disorder among college students. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 116, Article 152328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2022.152328
• Johnson, J. C., Degenhardt, B. F., Smith, C. K., & Foster, C. R. (2018). Tool for predicting medical student burnout from sustained stress levels: Factor analysis of the Medical Education Hassles Scale-R. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 118(3), 170–180.
• Joolaee, S., Jafarian Amiri, S. R., Farahani, M. A., & Varaei, S. (2015). Iranian nursing students' preparedness for clinical training: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 35(10), e13–e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.07.026
• Kaiser, H. F., & Cerny, B. A. (1979). Factor analysis of the image correlation matrix. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39(4), 711–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447903900402
• Khess, C. R., & Sahoo, S. (2010). Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among young male adults in India: A dimensional and categorical diagnoses-based study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198(12), 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181fe75dc
• Kirby, E. D., Muroy, S. E., Sun, W. G., Covarrubias, D., Leong, M. J., Barchas, L. A., & Kaufer, D. (2013). Acute stress enhances adult rat hippocampal neurogenesis and activation of newborn neurons via secreted astrocytic FGF2. eLife, 2, Article e00362. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00362
• Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
• Kulsoom, B., & Afsar, N. A. (2015). Stress, anxiety, and depression among medical students in a multiethnic setting. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 11, 1713–1722.
• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
• Leonhard, C. (2023). Review of statistical and methodological issues in the forensic prediction of malingering from validity tests: Part II-Methodological issues. Neuropsychology Review, 33(3), 604–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-023-09602-6
• Lo Martire, V., & Caruso, D. (2020). Stress & sleep: A relationship lasting a lifetime. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 117, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.024
• Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2022). SOLOMON: A method for splitting a sample into equivalent subsamples in factor analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 54(6), 2665–2677. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01750-y
• Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
• Marchewka, W., Loster, Z., Marchewka, J., & Loster, B. W. (2020). Stress associated with undergraduate medical courses: A translation and validation of the Perceived Medical School Stress instrument into Polish and its adaptation to the Polish environment. Folia Medica Cracoviensia, 60(2), 55–66.
• Marsh, H. W., Guo, J., Dicke, T., Parker, P. D., & Craven, R. G. (2020). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal balance between goodness of fit and parsimony. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503
• McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we'll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144
• Meng, R., Li, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, D., & Liu, B. (2020). The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: Development and validation amongst medical students and workers. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), Article 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1
• Moir, F., Yielder, J., Sanson, J., & Chen, Y. (2018). Depression in medical students: Current insights. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 9, 323–333. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S137384
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
• Puthran, R., Zhang, M. W., Tam, W. W., & Ho, R. C. (2016). Prevalence of depression amongst medical students: A meta-analysis. Medical Education, 50(4), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12962
• Quek, T. T., Tam, W. W., Tran, B. X., Zhang, M., Zhang, Z., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2019). The global prevalence of anxiety among medical students: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(15), Article 2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152735
• Roberts, L. W., Warner, T. D., Lyketsos, C., Frank, E., Ganzini, L., & Carter, D. (2001). Perceptions of academic vulnerability associated with personal illness: A study of 1,027 students at nine medical schools. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 42(1), 1–15.
• Sidana, S., Kishore, J., Ghosh, V., Gulati, D., Jiloha, R., & Anand, T. (2012). Prevalence of depression in students of a medical college in New Delhi: A cross-sectional study. Australasian Medical Journal, 5(5), 247–250. https://doi.org/10.4066/AMJ.2012.750
• Slavin, S. J., Schindler, D. L., & Chibnall, J. T. (2014). Medical student mental health 3.0: Improving student wellness through curricular changes. Academic Medicine, 89(4), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000166
• Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
• Thorndike, R. M. (1995). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.) by Jum Nunnally and Ira Bernstein [Book review]. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(3), 303–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169501900308
• Tjia, J., Givens, J. L., & Shea, J. A. (2005). Factors associated with undertreatment of medical student depression. Journal of American College Health, 53(5), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.53.5.219-224
• van Zyl, L. E., & Ten Klooster, P. M. (2021). Exploratory structural equation modeling: Practical guidelines and tutorial with a convenient online tool for Mplus. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, Article 795672. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.795672
• Vanmeter, F. (2020). Resilience. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 173, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64150-2.00008-3
• Vitaliano, P. P., Maiuro, R. D., Mitchell, E., & Russo, J. (1989). Perceived stress in medical school: Resistors, persistors, adaptors and maladaptors. Social Science & Medicine, 28(12), 1321–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(89)90351-1
• Voltmer, E., & Kötter, T. (2012). Perceived medical school stress and the development of behavior and experience patterns in German medical students. Medical Teacher, 34(10), 840–847. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.706339
• Yu, D. S., Lee, D. T., & Woo, J. (2004). Issues and challenges of instrument translation. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 26(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945903260554
• Zhang, C., Liang, C., Zhang, F., Zhang, Q., & Xu, K. (2025). Perceived Medical School Stress Scale – Chinese version. BMC Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02604-4

13. Items of the Scale