Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-3 (SATAQ-3)

Abstract

The Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-3 (SATAQ-3) is an internationally recognized, multidimensional self-report psychometric instrument designed to evaluate the endorsement, internalization, and perceived pressure of societal appearance ideals transmitted through mass media. Developed by J. Kevin Thompson, Patricia van den Berg, Megan Roehrig, Angela S. Guarda, and Leslie J. Heinberg (2004), the SATAQ-3 emerged as a comprehensive revision of earlier iterations (Heinberg et al., 1995) to overcome critical conceptual and empirical limitations in assessing body image disturbance and eating disorder etiology. Specifically, the SATAQ-3 delineates general thin-ideal internalization from athletic-ideal internalization, media pressure, and the acknowledgement of media as an instructional repository for aesthetic norms.

Comprising 30 items evaluated across a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Definitely Disagree) to 5 (Definitely Agree), the SATAQ-3 captures four robust, oblique dimensions: Internalization-General (9 items), Internalization-Athlete (5 items), Pressures (7 items), and Information (9 items). Psychometric investigations demonstrate superior reliability, with internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach’s alpha) consistently ranging from α = .89 to .96 across adolescent, college, and adult clinical and non-clinical samples. Structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirm the multidimensional construct validity, predictive utility, and distinct clinical relevance of separating athletic and thin ideals. The instrument serves as a cornerstone in research investigating the tripartite influence model, clinical etiology of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, body dysmorphic concerns, and targeted public health prevention interventions.

Keywords

SATAQ-3, Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire, body image disturbance, thin-ideal internalization, athletic-ideal internalization, media pressure, eating disorders, social comparison, tripartite influence model, psychometrics

Authors

The SATAQ-3 was developed by a team of prominent clinical psychologists and researchers specializing in body image, eating pathology, and quantitative psychometrics:

• J. Kevin Thompson, Ph.D. — Emeritus Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States. Dr. Thompson is widely regarded as a foundational theorist in body image pathology and developer of the Tripartite Influence Model. (Contact: Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., PCD 4118G, Tampa, FL 33620-8200; Email: [email protected] / [email protected]).
• Patricia van den Berg, Ph.D., MPH — Department of Psychology, University of South Florida; recognized for extensive epidemiological and longitudinal research on adolescent weight-related behaviors, body satisfaction, and eating pathology.
• Megan Roehrig, Ph.D. — Department of Psychology, University of South Florida; clinical researcher focusing on cognitive-behavioral correlates of disordered eating and body image disturbance.
• Angela S. Guarda, M.D. — Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Director of the Eating Disorders Program at Johns Hopkins Hospital, specializing in clinical trials, refeeding protocols, and phenotypic characterization of severe eating disorders.
• Leslie J. Heinberg, Ph.D. — Professor of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University; Director of Enterprise Weight Management and Enterprise Center for Behavioral Health at the Cleveland Clinic; co-developer of the original SATAQ (1995).

Purpose

The primary purpose of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-3 (SATAQ-3) is to provide an empirically validated, fine-grained psychometric evaluation of the multifaceted ways in which individuals engage with, internalize, and experience subjective distress from culturally sanctioned appearance standards promulgated by mass media. In contemporary Western and increasingly globalized societies, mass communication channels—including television programming, fashion magazines, cinematic productions, music videos, and commercial advertising—consistently portray an ultra-thin, hyper-toned, and rigorously sculpted physical aesthetic as an essential determinant of social worth, attractiveness, and success.

Historically, early assessment tools aggregated media exposure, cognitive awareness of social beauty norms, and personal internalization into undifferentiated indices. This conceptual confounding hindered researchers from distinguishing individuals who merely recognized cultural standards from those who actively incorporated those standards into their self-evaluative cognitive schema. The SATAQ-3 directly resolves this theoretical challenge by decoupling media utility (the Information dimension), subjective coercion (the Pressures dimension), and cognitive commitment (the Internalization dimensions). Crucially, the SATAQ-3 also addresses the paradigm shift in cultural beauty norms that occurred in the late 1990s and early 2000s, wherein women and men were increasingly confronted not only with the imperative to be thin, but also with the cultural mandate to appear athletic, muscular, and physically conditioned.

In clinical practice, the SATAQ-3 serves as an invaluable diagnostic and treatment-monitoring tool. Elevated scores across the Pressures and Internalization subscales function as robust prospective indicators for the onset and maintenance of severe eating pathologies, including anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder, as well as comorbid depressive symptomatology and body dysmorphic disorder. Clinicians utilize SATAQ-3 subscale profiling to tailor cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) protocols, identifying whether interventions must focus on dismantling media literacy deficits, mitigating upwards social comparison tendencies, or cognitive restructuring of core identity beliefs tethered to physical perfectionism.

Within academic research, the SATAQ-3 functions as the operational benchmark for testing multivariate causal models of body image disturbance. It provides the empirical scaffolding required to quantify the mediating mechanisms of media exposure, evaluating how environmental risk factors interact with psychological vulnerability markers (such as perfectionism, low self-esteem, and negative affectivity) to forecast restrictive dieting, excessive exercise regimens, and cosmetic surgery pursuit.

Psychological Construct

The SATAQ-3 operationalizes the broad psychological construct of sociocultural appearance attitude adoption as a hierarchical, four-factor domain. Rather than conceptualizing sociocultural influence as a unidimensional continuum, the instrument captures distinct cognitive, perceptual, and motivational facets:

1. Internalization-General (9 items)

This subscale captures the deep cognitive assimilation of conventional mass-media beauty ideals—predominantly characterized by extreme thinness, low body fat, and immaculate physical proportions—into an individual’s core self-concept and evaluative schema. Individuals exhibiting high levels of general internalization do not merely view idealized media models as external phenomena; they adopt these hyper-aestheticized images as personal benchmarks for self-worth. They consistently engage in upward appearance-based social comparison (e.g., comparing their body to television stars, movie actors, and magazine models) and manifest intense desires to alter their somatic features to mirror commercial archetypes. Illustrative items include: “I would like my body to look like the models who appear in magazines” (Item 7) and “I compare my appearance to the appearance of TV and movie stars” (Item 8).

2. Internalization-Athlete (5 items)

Distinct from the pursuit of passive slender aesthetics, the Internalization-Athlete subscale assesses the cognitive endorsement and personal integration of an athletic, muscular, toned, and vigorously conditioned physical ideal. Historically, body image instruments failed to distinguish between the desire for emaciation and the drive for functional, sculpted muscularity. The SATAQ-3 measures the extent to which an individual aspires to look like sports athletes, actively compares their musculature and fitness levels to athletic figures, and desires an athletic physical presentation. This dimension is particularly salient across both athletic and non-athletic cohorts, fitness subcultures, and male populations where the desire for muscular definition often overshadows the desire for simple weight loss. Representative items include: “I wish I looked as athletic as sports stars” (Item 23) and “I try to look like sports athletes” (Item 30).

3. Pressures (7 items)

The Pressures dimension operationalizes the subjective, perceived external demand or coercion exerted by media channels (television, fashion magazines, commercial advertisements) directing the individual to conform to societal aesthetic expectations. Unlike internalization—which reflects personal cognitive ownership—pressure reflects the subjective sensation of external scrutiny, behavioral mandates, and social expectations urging the individual to diet, exercise, lose weight, or fundamentally modify their appearance to meet conventional attractiveness standards. High scores on this subscale reflect significant psychological distress generated by media-based behavioral coercion. Exemplary items include: “I’ve felt pressure from TV and magazines to be thin” (Item 10) and “I’ve felt pressure from TV or magazines to diet” (Item 18).

4. Information (9 items)

The Information subscale measures the degree to which an individual regards mass media vehicles (commercials, films, music videos, pictorial spreads) as legitimate, authoritative, and instructive instructional resources regarding fashion, lifestyle trends, grooming, and what constitutes subjective attractiveness in modern culture. This dimension reflects an instrumental, epistemic orientation toward media content. An individual can perceive media as an important informational guide regarding aesthetic benchmarks without necessarily feeling personal distress or internalizing those standards into their identity, although information endorsement frequently serves as a developmental precursor to internalization. Representative items include: “TV programs are an important source of information about fashion and ‘being attractive’” (Item 1) and “Magazine advertisements are an important source of information about fashion and ‘being attractive’” (Item 17).

Theoretical Framework

The architecture of the SATAQ-3 is grounded in several interconnected socio-cognitive and developmental theories that elucidate the interplay between cultural artifacts, perceptual processing, and psychopathology:

The Tripartite Influence Model

The foundational theoretical framework underpinning the SATAQ-3 is the Tripartite Influence Model of Body Image and Eating Disturbance, formulated by Thompson, Heinberg, Altabe, and Tantleff-Dunn (1999). This comprehensive model posits that three primary sociocultural vectors—peers, parents, and the mass media—exert direct and indirect pressures on individuals regarding physical appearance. According to this framework, media exposure does not directly trigger body dissatisfaction or clinical eating disorders in a mechanical fashion. Instead, the psychological impact of cultural transmission is fully or partially mediated by two critical cognitive processes:

1. Internalization of Sociocultural Ideals: The psychological process whereby societal values regarding physical appearance are integrated into the personal belief system, converting an external cultural expectation into an internal behavioral imperative.
2. Appearance Comparison Processes: The chronic tendency to benchmark one’s physical features against peer, familial, and media exemplars.

The SATAQ-3 was explicitly constructed to capture these distinct structural pathways, allowing researchers to operationalize the exact transition points from media informational awareness, to perceived external coercion (Pressures), to complete psychological assimilation (Internalization).

Social Comparison Theory

The SATAQ-3 heavily operationalizes tenets from Leon Festinger’s (1954) Social Comparison Theory. Festinger postulated that human beings possess an innate, evolutionarily derived drive to assess their abilities, characteristics, and physical traits. In the absence of objective, physical standards, individuals evaluate themselves by comparing their attributes against available social referents. Within contemporary visual cultures, media-broadcasted models and celebrities function as ubiquitous, salient targets of upward social comparison—targets who possess vastly superior, digitally manipulated, and surgically enhanced physical traits.

SATAQ-3 items specifically measure these comparative cognitive operations (e.g., Items 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24). When individuals engage in habitual upward comparisons with artificial cultural ideals, the resulting perceived discrepancy between the ideal standard and their authentic biological reality invariably generates profound body dissatisfaction, somatic shame, and negative affect.

Objectification Theory

The conceptual framing of the SATAQ-3 also interfaces with Objectification Theory (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997). This socio-psychological paradigm maintains that cultural environments treat female bodies (and increasingly male bodies) as sexual objects to be looked at, scrutinized, and aesthetically judged. Chronic exposure to objectifying cultural media socializes individuals to adopt an observer’s perspective on their own physical selves—a psychological state termed self-objectification. Self-objectification manifests as habitual body surveillance, monitoring how one looks rather than how one feels or functions. The SATAQ-3 measures the direct cognitive outcomes of self-objectification by evaluating whether individuals use external commercial standards to calibrate their personal body shape aspirations.

Cultivation Theory

From a mass communications perspective, the SATAQ-3 reflects George Gerbner’s Cultivation Theory (1973). Cultivation theory posits that prolonged, cumulative exposure to mass media subtly shapes consumers’ perceptions of social reality, leading heavy media consumers to perceive the real world through the stylized, homogenized lens of media depictions. In the context of appearance, prolonged media consumption cultivates the cognitive illusion that the biologically rare “thin-and-sculpted” physique is normative, achievable, and essential for interpersonal acceptance, thereby cementing the endorsement of media as a primary informational compass.

Validity

The SATAQ-3 has undergone extensive psychometric validation across thousands of research participants, consistently exhibiting superior construct, convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity.

Construct and Factorial Validity

In the seminal validation study conducted by Thompson, van den Berg, Roehrig, Guarda, and Heinberg (2004), the construct validity of the 30-item questionnaire was evaluated on a cohort of 327 undergraduate females and cross-validated with independent clinical and non-clinical samples. Both exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) robustly confirmed that a four-factor model provided an optimal fit to the data, decisively outperforming one-factor, two-factor, or three-factor permutations. The separation of Internalization-General and Internalization-Athlete confirmed that individuals cognitively distinguish between the desire for low body weight/thinness and the pursuit of muscular, athletic fitness.

Convergent Validity

The SATAQ-3 subscales exhibit substantial, theoretically predicted correlations with established psychometric inventories assessing eating disturbance, body shape concerns, and psychological functioning:

• Body Shape Concerns: Scores on the SATAQ-3 Pressures and Internalization-General subscales correlate powerfully with the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ) (correlations typically ranging from r = .60 to .75, p < .001).
• Eating Pathology: Strong positive associations are consistently documented with subscales of the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI; Garner et al., 1983), particularly Drive for Thinness (r = .65 to .73) and Body Dissatisfaction (r = .55 to .68), as well as total scores on the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26).
• Appearance Comparison: Strong convergent associations occur with the Physical Appearance Comparison Scale (PACS) and the Upward Physical Appearance Comparison Scale (UPACS), confirming that the internalization items accurately track comparative social behaviors (r > .55).
• Self-Esteem and Negative Affect: The Pressures and Internalization-General subscales correlate negatively with Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale scores (r = -.30 to -.45) and positively with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), supporting the conceptual link between cultural internalization and depressive vulnerabilities.

Discriminant Validity

The SATAQ-3 exhibits clear discriminant validity, establishing that its subscales assess appearance-specific psychological processes rather than generalized psychological distress or trait neuroticism. While Internalization-General correlates heavily with drive for thinness, the Internalization-Athlete subscale correlates preferentially with measures of exercise frequency, athletic identity, and the drive for muscularity (e.g., the Drive for Muscularity Scale; McCreary & Sasse, 2000), while demonstrating substantially lower correlations with vomiting behaviors and laxative abuse. Furthermore, the Information subscale demonstrates modest associations with eating disorder symptoms, proving that merely recognizing the media as an aesthetic information provider does not inherently yield pathological body dissatisfaction in the absence of internalization or perceived pressure.

Predictive and Incremental Validity

Hierarchical multiple regression analyses demonstrate that the SATAQ-3 subscales account for significant incremental variance in eating disordered behaviors (dietary restriction, purging, binge eating) above and beyond generalized risk factors such as body mass index (BMI), objective media consumption hours, perfectionism, and global self-esteem. Longitudinal prospective designs (e.g., Stice, 2002; Thompson et al., 2004) indicate that baseline elevations on the Pressures and Internalization-General subscales prospectively predict the onset of clinical eating disorders and significant escalations in body dissatisfaction across multi-year follow-up intervals.

Reliability

The SATAQ-3 demonstrates exceptional psychometric reliability across internal consistency metrics, test-retest temporal stability, and measurement error parameters across diverse populations.

Internal Consistency

In the foundational instrument development and validation study by Thompson et al. (2004), internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach’s alpha) for the four subscales among female university samples were exceptionally high:

• Information: α = .96 (demonstrating virtually no item-level redundancy while maintaining maximum internal coherence across all 9 items).
• Pressures: α = .92 (demonstrating outstanding homogeneity in reflecting perceived media coercion across all 7 items).
• Internalization-General: α = .92 (reflecting unified cognitive endorsement of the thin ideal across 9 items).
• Internalization-Athlete: α = .89 (reflecting robust internal consistency across 5 items evaluating athletic aspirations).

Subsequent psychometric evaluations across varied demographic sectors—including male cohorts, adolescent populations (11–17 years), and international cross-cultural adaptations (e.g., French, Spanish, Italian, German, Japanese, and Chinese versions)—have sustained these high reliability benchmarks, with Cronbach’s alpha values almost universally remaining above .85 across subscales. McDonald’s omega (ω) coefficients, which avoid the conservative bias of Cronbach’s alpha under violated tau-equivalence, similarly confirm composite reliability values exceeding .90 for the main subscales.

Test-Retest Temporal Stability

Evaluations of temporal stability across intervals ranging from 2 to 6 weeks indicate robust test-retest reliability intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Pearson coefficients. In stable student samples over a 3-week test-retest window, stability coefficients yielded values of r = .88 for Information, r = .84 for Pressures, r = .86 for Internalization-General, and r = .82 for Internalization-Athlete, confirming that the questionnaire captures durable trait-like sociocultural orientations rather than transient situational fluctuations.

Standard Error of Measurement

The standard error of measurement (SEM) across all subscales remains consistently low across empirical evaluations, indicating high precision in estimating true scores. Item-total correlations across the subscales generally exceed .60, with no individual item displaying an item-total correlation below .45, confirming that each item contributes meaningfully and uniquely to its designated construct.

Factor Analysis

The psychometric derivation and structural verification of the SATAQ-3 involved rigorous exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic procedures that resolved ambiguities inherent in earlier two-factor models of sociocultural attitudes.

Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)

During scale development, Thompson and colleagues (2004) subjected an expanded pool of candidate items to exploratory factor analysis using Principal Axis Factoring (PAF) with both orthogonal (Varimax) and oblique (Promax) rotations. Oblique rotation was prioritized theoretically due to the anticipated structural intercorrelations among distinct facets of media influence. Factor extraction was guided by Kaiser’s eigenvalue-greater-than-1.0 criterion, Cattell’s scree plot examination, and parallel analysis.

The final four-factor solution accounted for 64.7% of the total variance. Factor loadings for retained items were notably high, with all primary loadings exceeding .50 (the majority exceeding .65) and secondary cross-loadings remaining negligible (consistently below .25). The four derived factors mapped cleanly onto:

1. Factor 1: Information (eigenvalue = 11.23; accounting for 37.4% of initial variance), consisting of 9 items assessing media utility.
2. Factor 2: Pressures (eigenvalue = 3.65; accounting for 12.2% of variance), consisting of 7 items assessing perceived media pressure.
3. Factor 3: Internalization-General (eigenvalue = 2.78; accounting for 9.3% of variance), consisting of 9 items assessing thin-ideal internalization.
4. Factor 4: Internalization-Athlete (eigenvalue = 1.76; accounting for 5.9% of variance), consisting of 5 items assessing athletic-ideal internalization.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

Confirmatory factor analyses utilizing maximum likelihood estimation have replicated this oblique four-factor structure across multiple independent samples. In the original CFA validation sample (Thompson et al., 2004), the four-factor model demonstrated exceptional goodness-of-fit indices:

• Comparative Fit Index (CFI): .95 to .97, comfortably exceeding the standard .95 threshold for superior model fit.
• Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI): .94 to .96.
• Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA): .051 to .058 (with a 90% confidence interval ranging from .044 to .063), indicating close fit to the population covariance structure.
• Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR): .046.

Direct statistical comparisons between competing models confirmed that the four-factor oblique model exhibited a statistically significant improvement in chi-square (Δχ², p < .001) compared to a unidimensional model, a two-factor model (collapsing awareness and internalization), and a three-factor model (collapsing General and Athletic internalization). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) has demonstrated scalar and metric measurement invariance across gender and multiple racial/ethnic groups, indicating that the latent constructs are conceptualized and measured equivalently across diverse demographics.

Instrument / Measurement Tool

The SATAQ-3 is formatted as a standardized, brief, highly accessible self-report rating scale. Its structural parameters and administration details are delineated below:

• Test Type: Multidimensional self-report rating scale / psychometric inventory.
• Administration Format: Paper-and-pencil or digital/computerized survey administration; suitable for individual or large-group testing environments.
• Target Population: Adolescents (ages 12 and older) and adults across clinical, collegiate, and community populations.
• Administration Time: Approximately 5 to 10 minutes.
• Number of Items: 30 items.
• Response Scale: 5-point Likert rating scale with the following anchors:
  • 1 = Definitely Disagree
  • 2 = Mostly Disagree
  • 3 = Neither Agree Nor Disagree
  • 4 = Mostly Agree
  • 5 = Definitely Agree
• Subscale Structural Breakdown:
  • Internalization-General (9 items): Items 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16, 27
  • Internalization-Athlete (5 items): Items 19, 20, 23, 24, 30
  • Pressures (7 items): Items 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26
  • Information (9 items): Items 1, 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 28, 29
• Reverse-Keyed Items: Eight items are worded negatively to minimize acquiescence response bias and must be reverse-scored prior to calculating subscale metrics: Items 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 19, 27, and 28 (Reverse scoring algorithm: 1 → 5, 2 → 4, 3 → 3, 4 → 2, 5 → 1, or mathematically: Recoded Score = 6 − Raw Score).
• Scoring and Interpretation Procedures:
  • Subscale scores are typically computed by calculating the arithmetic mean of the designated items (or alternatively, the cumulative sum) within that subscale following reverse-coding.
  • Calculating subscale means (ranging from 1.0 to 5.0) preserves the intuitive interpretation of the original 5-point Likert scale.
  • Higher scores uniformly indicate greater internalization of appearance ideals, higher perceived media pressure, or greater reliance on media as an informational reference.
  • A single composite “total score” is generally discouraged in empirical research, as the four subscales assess conceptually and statistically distinct dimensions of media influence.

Permissions & Fee and Test Year

The SATAQ-3 was formally published and validated in 2004 (with preliminary peer-reviewed online dissemination occurring in late 2003 via Wiley InterScience). The instrument was developed by J. Kevin Thompson, Ph.D., and his research colleagues at the Department of Psychology, University of South Florida.

Licensing and Accessibility:

• Academic and Non-Commercial Research: The SATAQ-3 is considered an open-access scientific instrument for non-commercial academic research, pedagogical purposes, and non-profit clinical evaluation. Researchers and clinicians may utilize the scale without royalty fees, provided full bibliographic attribution and citation are accorded to the original authors (Thompson et al., 2004).
• Commercial Use: Any commercial deployment, inclusion within proprietary software platforms, digital monetization, or use within sponsored commercial clinical trials requires formal written permission and contractual licensing from the copyright holders and developers.
• Author Contact: For inquiries regarding the scale, specialized normative datasets, or licensing, inquiries can be directed to:
  J. Kevin Thompson, Ph.D.
  Department of Psychology, University of South Florida
  4202 E. Fowler Ave., PCD 4118G, Tampa, FL 33620-8200
  Email: [email protected] / [email protected]

References

The following foundational peer-reviewed studies, theoretical treatises, and psychometric monographs document the development, validation, and theoretical framework of the SATAQ-3:

• Cash, T. F. (2004). Body image: What do you see when you look in the mirror? Guilford Press.
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
• Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
• Garner, D. M., Olmstead, M. P., & Polivy, J. (1983). Development and validation of a multidimensional eating disorder inventory for anorexia nervosa and bulimia. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 2(2), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.4.622
• Heinberg, L. R., Thompson, J. K., & Stormer, S. (1995). Development and validation of the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448480009596271
• Stice, E. (2002). Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 825–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.825
• Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. R., Altabe, M., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10312-000
• Thompson, J. K., van den Berg, P., Roehrig, M., Guarda, A. S., & Heinberg, L. J. (2004). The Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Scale-3 (SATAQ-3): Development and validation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.10257

13. Items of the Scale (Questionnaire)