Nursing Students’ Clinical Practice Stress Scale

Abstract

The Nursing Students’ Clinical Practice Stress Scale (NSCPSS) is an empirically validated, specialized psychometric instrument engineered to evaluate, quantify, and differentiate the multifaceted dimensions of psychological stress experienced by undergraduate nursing students during their mandatory hospital and community-based clinical practica. Conceived and psychometrically validated within an exploratory sequential mixed-methods research paradigm, the scale addresses the persistent ecological gap between didactic nursing education and the emotionally turbulent, high-acuity demands of direct patient care environments. While clinical rotations represent the indispensable pedagogical core of nursing curricula worldwide, they operate simultaneously as potent catalysts for acute anxiety, burnout, clinical errors, and premature institutional attrition, particularly within developing or resource-constrained healthcare infrastructures.

The NSCPSS consists of 17 items scored across a 5-point Likert scale, yielding an aggregate stress score ranging from 17 to 85, where higher scores signify elevated levels of perceived clinical practice stress. The multidimensional operationalization of the tool captures four distinct yet conceptually interlinked structural domains: (1) Lack of knowledge, skills, and experience, reflecting internal cognitive appraisals of clinical inadequacy and the existential dread of inflicting patient harm; (2) Lack of academic communication and support systems, measuring the friction arising from unsupportive pedagogical mentorship, vague clinical evaluation criteria, and fractured faculty liaison; (3) Challenges in managing academic and clinical demands, capturing the logistical exhaustion and cognitive overload of concurrently satisfying rigorous academic requirements and exhausting clinical shift duties; and (4) Challenges in the clinical learning environment, evaluating systemic stressors rooted in ward hierarchy, lateral violence, infrastructural deficits, and hostile organizational climates.

Psychometric evaluation of the NSCPSS confirms exceptional construct validity and robust structural fidelity. Following an initial exploratory factor analysis that isolated a four-factor matrix explaining 57.0% of the total variance, confirmatory factor analysis verified excellent model fit indices: $\chi^2/\text{df} = 1.21$ ($p = 0.066$), Comparative Fit Index ($\text{CFI} = 0.954$), Tucker-Lewis Index ($\text{TLI} = 0.942$), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation ($\text{RMSEA} = 0.049$). Evidence of content validity was documented through a scale-level content validity index ($\text{S-CVI/Ave} = 0.89$), while discriminant validity was substantiated using the conservative Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations ($text{HTMT} < 0.85$). Internal consistency reliability yielded subscale Cronbach's alpha coefficients spanning from 0.69 to 0.83, reinforced by Composite Reliability values exceeding the 0.60 threshold across all latent constructs. The NSCPSS constitutes a diagnostically sensitive tool for nurse educators, educational psychologists, and academic administrators committed to early detection, curriculum optimization, and the institutional safeguarding of pre-licensure clinician well-being.

Keywords

clinical practice stress, nursing students, psychometrics, scale development, mixed methods, clinical education, psychological stress, nursing education, construct validity, confirmatory factor analysis, Sri Lanka, student well-being

Authors

The Nursing Students’ Clinical Practice Stress Scale was developed and validated by an interdisciplinary research team from Sri Lanka:

• Anjali Chamika Rathnayaka Mudiyanselage (Corresponding Author)
  Affiliations: Department of Nursing, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Kandy, Sri Lanka; and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
  Email: [email protected]
• S. Samita
  Affiliation: Department of Crop Science / Applied Statistics Unit, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Kandy, Sri Lanka.

Purpose

The primary objective underlying the development of the Nursing Students’ Clinical Practice Stress Scale (NSCPSS) is to provide a contextually grounded, structurally rigorous, and ecologically sensitive psychometric instrument to measure the specialized stressors encountered by undergraduate nursing students during hospital and clinical training rotations. Although broad-spectrum psychological inventories—such as the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) or the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS)—are frequently administered in tertiary educational settings, their generalized items fail to diagnose the operational, procedural, relational, and ethical quandaries endemic to clinical immersion. Conversely, established nursing-specific stress scales have predominantly been formulated within Western educational and healthcare architectures characterized by low patient-to-nurse ratios, advanced clinical simulation centers, and dedicated preceptor models. Such instruments often exhibit poor ecological and cultural portability when transposed into developing or resource-constrained healthcare contexts.

In regions such as South Asia, undergraduate nursing students navigate clinical training amidst systemic complexities: severe clinical staffing shortages, crowded public tertiary wards, limited procedural supplies, dual institutional reporting hierarchies (hospital clinical staff versus university faculty), and traditional paternalistic workplace cultures. The NSCPSS was purposely engineered to reflect these realities. By moving past one-dimensional conceptions of general academic anxiety, the scale disaggregates clinical practice stress into four quantifiable, actionable domains. It enables clinical educators and academic administrators to determine whether an individual student’s elevated stress originates from subjective skill deficits, inadequate supervisory support, scheduling conflicts, or adverse physical and interpersonal ward environments.

From an applied clinical education perspective, the NSCPSS serves both diagnostic and evaluative functions:

• Targeted Remediation and Early Screening: The scale can be administered longitudinally (e.g., prior to initial clinical entry, mid-rotation, and post-practicum) to detect students exhibiting critical thresholds of distress. Early identification allows clinical preceptors to intervene proactively before stress manifests as clinical mistakes, needle-stick injuries, profound absenteeism, somatic illness, or course withdrawal.
• Curricular and Placement Evaluation: Aggregated subscale scores supply academic faculties with institutional audit metrics. For example, if cohort scores on the Lack of academic communication and support systems subscale remain persistently elevated across specific clinical wards, faculty leadership can review clinical educator behavior, refine supervisory protocols, or recalibrate preceptor training programs.
• Health Workforce Policy and Retention Research: As developing nations strive to meet World Health Organization (WHO) nursing workforce targets, curbing undergraduate attrition is vital. The NSCPSS supplies empirical data on the exact systemic pain points that deter students from completing their pre-licensure education, providing an empirical rationale for educational investment and structural reform.

Psychological Construct

The psychological construct operationalized by the NSCPSS is clinical practice stress, defined as the multidimensional subjective state of emotional tension, cognitive strain, and behavioral vulnerability experienced by pre-registration nursing undergraduates when the contextual and relational demands of the clinical practicum exceed their perceived personal, procedural, or academic coping resources. Rooted in the premise that clinical stress is not a monolithic physiological response but a transactional product of internal vulnerabilities interacting with external systemic forces, the NSCPSS models this construct along four correlated primary dimensions:

1. Lack of Knowledge, Skills, and Experience

This internal, cognitive-evaluative dimension captures the acute psychological disequilibrium experienced by students when confronted with the reality of direct patient care while feeling pedagogically unprepared. It reflects the intense emotional friction between abstract theoretical knowledge acquired in academic lecture halls and the procedural precision demanded at the bedside. Central to this subscale is the student’s hyper-awareness of their procedural inexperience and the terrifying prospect of committing an iatrogenic error that results in patient morbidity or mortality. Specific manifestations include fear of executing invasive interventions (e.g., cannulation, catheterization, medication calculation and administration), anxiety when responding to rapid physiological deterioration, feelings of impostorism, and paralysis caused by fear of making mistakes in real time.

2. Lack of Academic Communication and Support Systems

This relational and structural dimension evaluates the stress induced by deficiencies in pedagogical supervision, mentorship, and transparent evaluative dialogue between academic faculties and students within the hospital setting. Nursing students occupy an ambiguous liminal position: they are university students governed by academic regulations, yet they function as novice caregivers embedded within hospital ward hierarchies. This subscale measures the frustration, isolation, and anxiety generated when university clinical instructors are physically absent, preceptors display indifferent or critical supervisory styles, feedback is punitive rather than formative, and clinical assessment metrics are obscure or inconsistently applied. The absence of an empathetic, psychologically safe feedback loop amplifies student vulnerability and prevents the effective consolidation of clinical competence.

3. Challenges in Managing Academic and Clinical Demands

This logistical and cognitive subscale encapsulates the friction resulting from the concurrent burden of dual institutional roles. Unlike traditional academic majors where schedules are relatively predictable, pre-registration nursing students must simultaneously fulfill full-time clinical shift work (including night shifts, weekend shifts, and rotational hospital duties) while completing didactic coursework, theoretical modules, continuous assessments, and clinical logbooks. This dimension captures chronic physical fatigue, sleep deprivation, cognitive exhaustion, and the chronic distress of feeling that dedication to one domain inevitably compromises performance in the other. It operationalizes the student’s daily struggle to navigate academic deadlines alongside the demanding physical reality of direct patient care.

4. Challenges in the Clinical Learning Environment

This environmental, organizational, and socio-cultural dimension evaluates the systemic stressors intrinsic to the clinical practice arena itself. Public hospitals, especially in developing economies, are frequently characterized by overcrowding, high patient turnover, critical material shortages, and high emotional stakes. Furthermore, hospital social structures can be rigid and hierarchical. This subscale measures the stress triggered by uncooperative ward staff, subtle or overt incivility (lateral violence or bullying from senior nursing staff or medical officers), lack of dedicated physical facilities for students (such as locker rooms or study spaces), and having to deliver care within unsupportive, chaotic, or poorly equipped clinical settings.

Theoretical Framework

The conceptual architecture of the NSCPSS integrates several foundational theoretical paradigms from health psychology, cognitive theory, and adult professional education:

Transactional Model of Stress and Coping

The foundational bedrock of the NSCPSS is the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping formulated by Richard Lazarus and Susan Folkman (1984). Under this model, stress is not conceptualized merely as an environmental stimulus (an objective workload) nor solely as a physiological response (tachycardia or autonomic arousal). Instead, stress is an evolving transaction between the individual and the environment, governed primarily by cognitive appraisal:

• Primary Appraisal: The student evaluates the clinical scenario to determine its personal relevance: Is this patient encounter benign, or does it represent a threat, challenge, or potential harm? In the NSCPSS, scenarios captured in the Lack of knowledge, skills, and experience domain represent profound primary threats to the student’s identity and moral obligation not to harm others.
• Secondary Appraisal: The student evaluates their available coping assets: “Do I possess the procedural skill, emotional resilience, or external support necessary to handle this demand?” When secondary appraisal reveals a deficit—such as in the Lack of academic communication and support systems domain—the student experiences acute cognitive and emotional strain, leading to maladaptive stress states.

Situated Learning and Legitimate Peripheral Participation

From an educational perspective, the scale is anchored in Situated Learning Theory and the concept of Communities of Practice advanced by Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger (1991). Nursing education requires novices to transition from the theoretical periphery of the classroom into direct practice via “legitimate peripheral participation” within hospital communities. For learning to occur, the peripheral participant must be granted social access, constructive scaffolding, and psychological safety. When the clinical environment is punitive, uncommunicative, or culturally hostile (as measured by the Challenges in the clinical learning environment subscale), students are relegated to an alienated, illegitimate periphery, experiencing intense occupational marginalization that blocks professional identity formation.

Bandura’s Theory of Self-Efficacy

Albert Bandura’s (1997) Self-Efficacy Theory provides a critical lens for understanding the procedural dimension of clinical stress. Self-efficacy—the conviction that one can successfully execute the behavior required to produce a specific outcome—is formed via mastery experiences, vicarious modeling, social persuasion, and physiological states. In high-acuity healthcare environments, when students lack mastery experiences and face unsupportive supervision, their perceived procedural self-efficacy collapses. This collapse elevates physiological arousal and performance anxiety, establishing a self-reinforcing cycle of perceived incompetence and acute psychological stress.

Validity

The psychometric validation of the NSCPSS followed an exploratory sequential mixed-methods protocol adhering strictly to contemporary psychometric standards outlined in the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.

Content and Face Validity

Initial item generation was rooted in qualitative interviews and focus group discussions with undergraduate nursing students, ensuring grounded ecological authenticity. The preliminary pool of items was subjected to formal content validation by a multidisciplinary panel of nurse educators, clinical preceptors, and psychometricians. Panelists evaluated each item for relevance, clarity, and representativeness using a 4-point rating scale. The resulting Scale-Level Content Validity Index based on the universal agreement and averaging approach (S-CVI/Ave) achieved an exceptional score of 0.89, well exceeding the recognized psychometric benchmark of 0.80. Face validity was verified through cognitive debriefing sessions with nursing students who reviewed the instrument for comprehensibility, linguistic precision, and contextual relevance.

Construct and Structural Validity

Construct validity was established through sequential exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) across split independent samples. The final 17-item, four-factor structural model demonstrated superior goodness-of-fit to the empirical data:

• Chi-Square to Degrees of Freedom Ratio: $\chi^2/\text{df} = 1.21$, indicating minimal discrepancy between the hypothesized model and observed covariance matrices ($p = 0.066$, indicating desirable non-significance).
• Incremental Fit Indices: Comparative Fit Index ($\text{CFI} = 0.954$) and Tucker-Lewis Index ($\text{TLI} = 0.942$), both exceeding the rigorous 0.90 and 0.95 thresholds indicative of excellent structural fit.
• Residual Fit Index: Root Mean Square Error of Approximation ($\text{RMSEA} = 0.049$) with a 90% confidence interval falling well within the conservative acceptable upper bound of 0.06 to 0.08.

Convergent and Discriminant Validity

Convergent validity was verified by evaluating the standardized factor loadings and Composite Reliability (CR) metrics. In the final structural model, standardized factor loadings across all 17 items exceeded the conservative retention threshold of 0.50. Composite Reliability coefficients for all four latent factors surpassed the conventional benchmark of 0.60, confirming that the indicators designated for each construct shared significant common variance.

Discriminant validity was established utilizing the modern, rigorous Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT) approach, which has superseded traditional Fornell-Larcker criteria in contemporary structural equation modeling due to its superior sensitivity to cross-loadings. Across all inter-construct pairings, HTMT values consistently fell below the conservative 0.85 threshold. This mathematical result confirms that the four dimensions of the NSCPSS reflect conceptually and empirically distinct sources of clinical stress rather than capturing redundant, overlapping psychological phenomena.

Reliability

The internal consistency and composite reliability of the NSCPSS were comprehensively assessed across the whole instrument and within its four constitutive subscales. Across psychometric testing, the scale exhibited acceptable to high internal consistency, confirming that its items reliably operationalize their respective target constructs.

Subscale Internal Consistency

• Subscale 1 (Lack of knowledge, skills, and experience): Yielded a robust Cronbach’s alpha of $\alpha = 0.83$, demonstrating high internal consistency among items capturing perceived clinical competence and the psychological burden of potential procedural errors.
• Subscale 2 (Lack of academic communication and support systems): Demonstrated strong internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of $\alpha = 0.79$, indicating strong inter-item reliability regarding supervisory and structural educational mentorship.
• Subscale 3 (Challenges in managing academic and clinical demands): Produced a Cronbach’s alpha of $\alpha = 0.69$. While fractionally below the conventional heuristic cutoff of 0.70, an alpha of 0.69 is considered fully acceptable for newly developed, short, four-to-five-item behavioral and situational stress subscales.
• Subscale 4 (Challenges in the clinical learning environment): Likewise yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of $\alpha = 0.69$, reflecting an acceptable level of internal consistency for capturing complex organizational, interpersonal, and environmental hospital phenomena.

Composite Reliability

Because Cronbach’s alpha assumes tau-equivalence (equal factor loadings across all items) and can underestimate reliability in multidimensional scales with varying item counts, Composite Reliability (CR) was calculated. All four subscales achieved CR values substantially exceeding the established psychometric criterion of 0.60, confirming the scale’s mathematical stability and low measurement error variance.

Factor Analysis

The latent architecture of the NSCPSS was discovered and validated through a classic two-stage exploratory-to-confirmatory factor analytical pipeline utilizing independent sample partitions from a total cohort of 183 undergraduate nursing students from the University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)

The EFA was performed on an initial calibration subsample of 95 nursing students ($n = 95$). The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity confirmed that the inter-item correlation matrix was factorable ($p < 0.001$). Factor extraction was conducted using principal axis factoring with oblique rotation, accommodating the theoretical expectation that dimensions of clinical stress correlate in natural healthcare settings.

Determination of the number of retained factors was guided by parallel analysis and visual inspection of Cattell’s scree plot. The extraction yielded a coherent four-factor solution that accounted for 57.0% of the total cumulative variance. During this exploratory phase, the initial 30-item pool was iteratively reduced. Items exhibiting communalities below 0.30, weak primary factor loadings ($< 0.40$), or substantial cross-loadings onto secondary factors with differentials less than 0.20 were systematically eliminated, reducing the scale to 19 candidate indicators.

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

The structural stability of the four-factor model was subsequently evaluated using a distinct cross-validation subsample of 88 nursing students ($n = 88$) via maximum likelihood structural equation modeling. In this confirmatory stage, the 19-item structure was scrutinized against modification indices and standardized residual covariances. Two items with standardized loadings below the conservative 0.50 threshold were pruned, yielding a parsimonious, psychometrically elegant 17-item final model.

Instrument / Measurement Tool

The operational profile and administration parameters of the Nursing Students’ Clinical Practice Stress Scale are structured as follows:

• Test Type: Psychometric self-report questionnaire / multidimensional rating inventory.
• Target Population: Pre-registration undergraduate nursing students, diploma nursing trainees, and novice nursing interns actively engaged in hospital or clinical practicum placements.
• Administration Mode: Self-administered (paper-and-pencil questionnaire or secure digital survey platforms such as Qualtrics or REDCap).
• Completion Time: Approximately 5 to 10 minutes.
• Item Count: 17 validated items across four orthogonal/correlated subscales.
• Response Scale: 5-point Likert scale (typically scored from 1 = None / Strongly Disagree to 5 = Severe / Strongly Agree, measuring either the perceived intensity or frequency of experienced stress).
• Scoring Rules:
  • Total Score: Calculated as the linear sum of all 17 items, yielding an aggregate continuous score ranging from 17 to 85. Higher numerical scores denote greater severity of perceived clinical practice stress.
  • Subscale Scores: Computed by summing or averaging the items designated under each of the four domains: (1) Lack of knowledge, skills, and experience; (2) Lack of academic communication and support systems; (3) Challenges in managing academic and clinical demands; and (4) Challenges in the clinical learning environment.
  • Reverse Scoring: No reverse-coded items are present in the final 17-item scale, simplifying scoring procedures.

Permissions & Fee and Test Year

• Test Publication Year: 2026 (published in Nursing Open).
• Copyright & Intellectual Property: Copyright is held by the original authors (Anjali Chamika Rathnayaka Mudiyanselage and S. Samita) and/or the publisher (John Wiley & Sons Ltd.).
• Accessibility & Licensing: The methodological framework, psychometric properties, and analytical findings are published as open-access research. However, the exact proprietary item statements remain under author and journal copyright and are not published in full in the open public domain.
• Permissions for Research & Clinical Use: Academic researchers, educational psychologists, and nursing faculty interested in utilizing, translating, or culturally adapting the NSCPSS for academic and clinical research should submit a formal permission request directly to the corresponding author: Anjali Chamika Rathnayaka Mudiyanselage at [email protected].
• Commercial Fee: Non-commercial academic research use typically requires written author consent without licensing fees, whereas corporate, proprietary, or commercial institutional licensing requires formal negotiation with the copyright holders.

References

• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
• Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
• Crosswell, A. D., & Lockwood, K. G. (2020). Best practices for stress measurement: How to measure psychological stress in health research. Health Psychology Open, 7(2), 2055102920933072. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102920933072
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
• Gassas, R. (2021). Sources of the knowledge-practice gap in nursing: Lessons from an integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 106, 105095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105095
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Harvey, G., Carter-Snell, C., Hussein, M., & Berlinguette, K. (2024). Coping with clinical related stress experienced by undergraduate nursing students: A scoping review. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 19(4), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2024.06.012
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
• Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
• Rathnayaka Mudiyanselage, A. C., & Samita, S. (2026). Nursing Students’ Clinical Practice Stress Scale. Nursing Open, Article nop2.70424. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70424

Items of the Scale